Re: Regarding checkpatch camelcase issues

[Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 02:40:41PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 05:25:38AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> > Thanks for your support.
> > 
> > I wanted to confirm if each checkpatch encounter for camelcase issue should
> > be fixed in a new patch?
> > 
> > For example: If the issue is with same variable, then multiple
> > modifications can be made in one patch.
> > 
> >   -> above example is OK
> > 
> > 
> > For example: If the issue is with multiple variables, then multiple
> > modifications can be made in one patch.
> > 
> >   -> above example is NOT OK / NG
> > 
> > 
> > Please confirm me if my understanding is correct?
> > 
> 
> I guess you have generated a patch series, then check it through
> checkpatch.
> 
> Indeed, if checkpatch complains at a particular patch, you need to do
> interactive rebase. Make sure that rebase todo list contains "edit"
> lines on commit you want to fix up. After that, fix these complaints.
> 
> When you're done, regenerate the patch series and make sure that there
> are no checkpatch complains on it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Thanks for the reply
I guess I was not clear. When I run checkpatch on a driver there
were so many camelcase issues in each file. So I wanted to know if I
proceed to fix them, should I submit each change as a patch or each file
as a patch?
Since each file has many camelcase issue and the driver has morethan one
such file.

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Guru