From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: fix buffer overflow potential for print_text()
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 19:29:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YAa0j9CG/6yrGcs+@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r1mh5mso.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
On (21/01/19 10:00), John Ogness wrote:
> On 2021-01-19, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > John, how did you spot these problems?
>
> I am preparing my series to remove the logbuf_lock, which also refactors
> and consolidates code from syslog_print_all() and
> kmsg_dump_get_buffer(). While testing/verifying my series, I noticed the
> these oddities in the semantics and decided I should research where they
> came from and if they were actually necessary.
Any chance you can put those tests somewhere public so that we can
run them regularly? (say, before Petr sends out a pull request to
Linus.)
> I wouldn't say the oddities are necessary (in fact, they are quite
> annoying), but we have decided to keep them in out of fear of breaking
> out-of-tree modules and/or interesting userspace code.
Sure.
> One positive effect of the rework is that we are finding these oddities
> and documenting them.
Absolutely agree.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-14 17:04 John Ogness
2021-01-15 12:04 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-15 12:07 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-19 0:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-01-19 8:54 ` John Ogness
2021-01-19 10:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2021-01-19 11:44 ` John Ogness
2021-01-19 12:22 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-19 11:20 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-15 14:16 ` John Ogness
2021-01-15 16:04 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-22 21:21 ` Sven Schnelle
2021-01-22 23:42 ` John Ogness
2021-01-23 21:18 ` Sven Schnelle
2021-01-23 21:41 ` Sven Schnelle
2021-01-24 8:13 ` John Ogness
2021-01-24 8:59 ` Sven Schnelle
2021-02-26 17:19 ` Alexander Gordeev
2021-02-26 17:39 ` John Ogness
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YAa0j9CG/6yrGcs+@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®