From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480B3C433E0 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D4364E30 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232853AbhBAJXj (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 04:23:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47128 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232543AbhBAJXh (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 04:23:37 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE68CC061574; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 01:22:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=m4R5BkzhKMHXACC3fJ4P7syCDqSSnz8E3Zk8HUxOaOY=; b=yyfRMlS8YY3jQfMNd/jpdcqegH kDZU5/i3dGRzP3LOFsCgPdeDIbNJZ9VK9Y3T+n7UUKo4s46/v1Ucnv/1KnbsiEUR3BZYVwac0LtrU 5kADJWX4sKKjCCZgcVnUQBxUWAWRluBx6q6B4/McX72rYhRKuaD/mpT2DrNH57eu001K5Pk5TwCY2 65FNTTnuJgJmNbtFk8/WLv5YLM/2uDrO2VgVIWvQrkSxCYrqbrQC4jB33+Rb3HZlZb6D6o2wUrVK7 9LxoY6nP5RRV2uN+ZCSSK3F842tM5YxsLcreQFXUSO9jgJFEHWbJODbFZwkdi2NkO/fqW6IClYFAF qEOsehFw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l6VPk-0006UK-Sw; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:22:33 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 129BF3011FE; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:22:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9AE942C10ABC9; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:22:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:22:27 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , andrii@kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau , David Miller , kpsingh@kernel.org, John Fastabend , netdev , bpf , LKML Subject: Re: extended bpf_send_signal_thread with argument Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:14:02PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to send a signal from a bpf program invoked from a > perf_event. There is: You can't. Sending signals requires sighand lock, and you're not allowed to take locks from perf_event context.