From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7172CC433DB for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 06:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AAA64F3F for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 06:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231195AbhBEGzy (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:55:54 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:41473 "EHLO wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230415AbhBEGzp (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:55:45 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A7F4E0; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:54:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 01:54:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=cpdqHFAP/ZgCSsQGHyNAf+SemKK m+IyMVPQ2A6yHkbk=; b=EErDkAVCLuZqZ/qCluF3af0UxCkTF5hH+hMzODbPuQB qVsrcwJt6X3eUjezWZijSNUSGUfdSk/RHn8laCJDbO9gt48Z6IbLV7IzwH9W++wY K94YcTwhcobKjlYoG1OiWad9+ic+zmLKcrwIIcB0tiXz5lnmfCZXMAk6Yi8MKfWU 6kI45VjScrKH+sVizKsVKLHereoOT1NcxnSqwLnCZyOe6uQ9JcZs1iU0EY1yuzQP POCBp4OcyETb9q/F34Wo8IygTylVdNjJDHeX48uVyBriv0nMV3zb1hxlcLOwFKj3 FubdGFVj2B7q7vNP84UTtm1Qk13Ss4Z8n1+WHWyQmlw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=cpdqHF AP/ZgCSsQGHyNAf+SemKKm+IyMVPQ2A6yHkbk=; b=mEkbWSolboWDaYEf8UvyoN SU2BTWTCk0Pyx4KRgk2c6XIUCaOckqpWBp8e7/HjYjyOjT8RXK7nxU8HU+GtCikC QoainnswER4Zcp3R3QJznTGrnH8X0B6RP2WxhYY3qy6UFRiz7ahrOTyCLuz+15uC NOeB10YvrQzlVz6D8xe1meGxQMx6Cxjc9LetQgEnoogdPgSBU1bkz9EUVTaNAc/Y QNM8ZTcSn7L3WvnciY289fLWBa2ZZGlNNjHAD9qDlNwFMlUyDa0YDqGrNmOa63Q9 K/c0XlM9Glne5ghau58hyC8sThw/Rd3WMQFxOr15s2sSEheQFfY/eU9XJNGPFQwg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeehgddutddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcu mffjuceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevueehje fgfffgiedvudekvdektdelleelgefhleejieeugeegveeuuddukedvteenucfkphepkeef rdekiedrjeegrdeigeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D852524005B; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 01:54:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:54:55 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Rapoport , Chris Wilson , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5 Message-ID: References: <161160687463.28991.354987542182281928@build.alporthouse.com> <20210204181925.GL299309@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:32:56AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:19 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit > > > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")? > > > > Unfortunately, I was too optimistic and didn't take into account that this > > commit changes the way /dev/mem sees the first page of memory. > > > > There were reports of slackware users about issues with lilo after upgrade > > from 5.10.11 to 5.10.12 > > Ok, applied to mainline. > > Greg & stable people - this is now commit 5c279c4cf206 ("Revert > "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0"") in my tree. > Although maybe you just want to revert the commit in stable, rather > than take it from upstream? Same difference. Taking it from upstream makes it easier to track over time what happend. I've queued it up now, thanks! greg k-h