From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "J. Avila" <elavila@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: avoid prb_first_valid_seq() where possible
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:44:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCDdwY8mMb9JZkXn@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210205141728.18117-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
On (21/02/05 15:23), John Ogness wrote:
> If message sizes average larger than expected (more than 32
> characters), the data_ring will wrap before the desc_ring. Once the
> data_ring wraps, it will start invalidating descriptors. These
> invalid descriptors hang around until they are eventually recycled
> when the desc_ring wraps. Readers do not care about invalid
> descriptors, but they still need to iterate past them. If the
> average message size is much larger than 32 characters, then there
> will be many invalid descriptors preceding the valid descriptors.
>
> The function prb_first_valid_seq() always begins at the oldest
> descriptor and searches for the first valid descriptor. This can
> be rather expensive for the above scenario. And, in fact, because
> of its heavy usage in /dev/kmsg, there have been reports of long
> delays and even RCU stalls.
>
> For code that does not need to search from the oldest record,
> replace prb_first_valid_seq() usage with prb_read_valid_*()
> functions, which provide a start sequence number to search from.
>
> Fixes: 896fbe20b4e2333fb55 ("printk: use the lockless ringbuffer")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Can we please also ask the kernel test robot to test this patch?
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 14:17 John Ogness
2021-02-08 6:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2021-02-08 9:21 ` John Ogness
2021-02-09 0:15 ` J. Avila
2021-02-10 18:00 ` John Ogness
2021-02-09 2:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-02-09 17:47 ` Petr Mladek
2021-02-10 18:26 ` John Ogness
2021-02-11 11:05 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YCDdwY8mMb9JZkXn@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=elavila@google.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®