From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Fraser <nfraser@codeweavers.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ulrich Czekalla <uczekalla@codeweavers.com>,
Huw Davies <huw@codeweavers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf buildid-cache: Add test for PE executable
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:43:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDZYEKJ7w+XgqA7S@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <295f5380-93a1-78fa-884b-afd4319b96d7@codeweavers.com>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:10:34AM -0500, Nicholas Fraser wrote:
SNIP
> +if ! which wine > /dev/null; then
> + echo "WARNING: wine not found. PE binaries will not be run."
> + run_pe=0
> +fi
> +
> ex_md5=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.ex.MD5.XXX)
> ex_sha1=$(mktemp /tmp/perf.ex.SHA1.XXX)
> +ex_pe=$(dirname $0)/../pe-file.exe
>
> echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' | cc -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -o ${ex_sha1} -x c -
> echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' | cc -Wl,--build-id=md5 -o ${ex_md5} -x c -
>
> -echo "test binaries: ${ex_sha1} ${ex_md5}"
> +echo "test binaries: ${ex_sha1} ${ex_md5} ${ex_pe}"
>
> check()
> {
> - id=`readelf -n ${1} 2>/dev/null | grep 'Build ID' | awk '{print $3}'`
> -
> + case $1 in
> + *.exe)
> + # the build id must be rearranged into a GUID
> + id=`objcopy -O binary --only-section=.buildid $1 /dev/stdout | \
> + cut -c 33-48 | hexdump -ve '/1 "%02x"' | \
> + sed 's@^\(..\)\(..\)\(..\)\(..\)\(..\)\(..\)\(..\)\(..\)\(.*\)0a$@\4\3\2\1\6\5\8\7\9@'`
> + ;;
wow ;-) could this have some more info on what's going on in here?
what's the .buildid PE section format?
> + *)
> + id=`readelf -n ${1} 2>/dev/null | grep 'Build ID' | awk '{print $3}'`
> + ;;
> + esac
> echo "build id: ${id}"
>
> link=${build_id_dir}/.build-id/${id:0:2}/${id:2}
> @@ -50,7 +73,7 @@ check()
> exit 1
> fi
>
> - ${perf} buildid-cache -l | grep $id
> + ${perf} buildid-cache -l | grep ${id}
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> echo "failed: ${id} is not reported by \"perf buildid-cache -l\""
> exit 1
> @@ -81,7 +104,7 @@ test_record()
> build_id_dir=$(mktemp -d /tmp/perf.debug.XXX)
> perf="perf --buildid-dir ${build_id_dir}"
>
> - ${perf} record --buildid-all -o ${data} ${1}
> + ${perf} record --buildid-all -o ${data} ${2} ${1}
it could be better just pass $@ and make sure test_record
args are passed in a way that record would accept them
test_record wine ${ex_pe}
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> echo "failed: record ${1}"
> exit 1
> @@ -96,12 +119,22 @@ test_record()
> # add binaries manual via perf buildid-cache -a
> test_add ${ex_sha1}
> test_add ${ex_md5}
> +if [ $add_pe -eq 1 ]; then
${add_pe}
> + test_add ${ex_pe}
> +fi
>
> # add binaries via perf record post processing
> test_record ${ex_sha1}
> test_record ${ex_md5}
> +if [ $run_pe -eq 1 ]; then
${run_pe}
> + test_record ${ex_pe} wine
I'm getting lot of wine's output, we should redirect that
every other run I'm getting some small window popup saying it's
updating wine and stuck forever.. could this be prevented?
> +fi
>
> # cleanup
> rm ${ex_sha1} ${ex_md5}
>
> +if [ $add_pe -eq 0 ] || [ $run_pe -eq 0 ]; then
> + echo "WARNING: some PE tests were skipped. See previous warnings."
> +fi
there's already a warning for this at the beginning,
I dont think we need another one
thanks,
jirka
> +
> exit ${err}
> --
> 2.30.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-24 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-19 16:10 Nicholas Fraser
2021-02-24 13:43 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-02-24 17:40 ` Nicholas Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YDZYEKJ7w+XgqA7S@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=huw@codeweavers.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nfraser@codeweavers.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=uczekalla@codeweavers.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®