mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
	kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
	niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] media: i2c: rdacm20: Enable noise immunity
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:24:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFEF0/ev7bJ8ghN6@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210316125607.lxhrgzahxvxfy6ll@uno.localdomain>

Hi Jacopo,

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:56:07PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:37:26PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:14:56PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > Enable the noise immunity threshold at the end of the rdacm20
> > > initialization routine.
> > >
> > > The rdacm20 camera module has been so far tested with a startup
> > > delay that allowed the embedded MCU to program the serializer. If
> > > the initialization routine is run before the MCU programs the
> > > serializer and the image sensor and their addresses gets changed
> > > by the rdacm20 driver it is required to manually enable the noise
> > > immunity threshold to make the communication on the control channel
> > > more reliable.
> >
> > I'm still worried by the race with the MCU. Any update on dumping the
> > MCU configuration to check what it initializes ?
> 
> Not yet, you're right ...
> 
> I mainly focused on testing with rdacm21, what if I strip the rdacm20
> changes out from this series ? I will have to keep the init()
> operation introduction to maintain compatibility with max9286 changes,
> and in case of no regressions, we can keep the 8 seconds delay in the
> .dtsi. However it will break upstream support on Eagle for rdacm20 as
> we don't have a regulator where to insert the startup delay there, and
> a downstream patch that waits for 8 seconds in the deserializer driver
> should be used instead...

I don't think the rdacm20 changes need to wait. Even this one could be
merged as-is, as long as we consider it to be a temporary workaround and
don't build anything on top that would make it more difficult to address
the issue properly (a TODO comment in the code could help).

> > > Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c | 8 +++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > > index 90eb73f0e6e9..f7fd5ae955d0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > > @@ -541,7 +541,13 @@ static int rdacm20_initialize(struct rdacm20_device *dev)
> > >
> > >  	dev_info(dev->dev, "Identified MAX9271 + OV10635 device\n");
> > >
> > > -	return 0;
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Set reverse channel high threshold to increase noise immunity.
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * This should be compensated by increasing the reverse channel
> > > +	 * amplitude on the remote deserializer side.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	return max9271_set_high_threshold(&dev->serializer, true);
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static int rdacm20_probe(struct i2c_client *client)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-16 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-15 13:14 [PATCH v2 00/18] media: gmsl: Reliability improvement Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] media: i2c: rdamc21: Fix warning on u8 cast Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 15:27   ` Kieran Bingham
2021-03-15 21:35   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-03-15 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] media: i2c: rdacm20: Enable noise immunity Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 21:37   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-03-16 12:56     ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-16 19:24       ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2021-03-15 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] media: i2c: rdacm20: Embedded 'serializer' field Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 15:29   ` Kieran Bingham
2021-03-15 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] media: i2c: rdacm20: Replace goto with a loop Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 15:36   ` Kieran Bingham
2021-03-15 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] media: i2c: rdacm20: Report camera module name Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] media: i2c: max9271: Check max9271_write() return Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 15:46   ` Kieran Bingham
2021-03-15 21:38   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] media: i2c: rdacm20: Check return values Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] media: i2c: rdacm20: Re-work ov10635 reset Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] media: i2c: max9271: Introduce wake_up() function Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 17:14   ` Kieran Bingham
2021-03-15 21:43   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] media: i2c: max9286: Adjust parameters indent Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] media: i2c: rdacm21: Fix OV10640 powerdown Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 17:20   ` Kieran Bingham
2021-03-15 21:45   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] media: i2c: rdacm21: Give more time to OV490 to boot Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 17:22   ` Kieran Bingham
2021-03-17 10:04     ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-19  0:29       ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-03-19 14:53         ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 21:52   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] media: i2c: max9286: Rename reverse_channel_mv Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] media: i2c: max9286: Cache channel amplitude Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] media: i2c: max9286: Define high " Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] media: v4l2-subdev: De-deprecate init() subdev op Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 21:56   ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] media: gmsl: Reimplement initialization sequence Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] media: i2c: max9286: Rework comments in .bound() Jacopo Mondi
2021-03-15 17:28   ` Kieran Bingham
2021-03-15 21:57   ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YFEF0/ev7bJ8ghN6@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
    --cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
    --cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome