From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E845BC433E0 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBA664EF6 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232094AbhCQRYc (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:24:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36548 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229944AbhCQRYU (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:24:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F787C06175F for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 205so8199737pgh.9 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rRAvRzhltoTzPQtf/yR8e3Dd74K9EO0zqzHJWWfU39k=; b=TVhHIE8e9q+oWf3oSYc+aY0MU9ukm6lmZmv4FZJ5W4K25ppzFu5it2w8B7qffhzSRv Mo+L+b5rrbxu7rn8tABYZcU+fmjNnHjAeKQjjEASrzmEBkTNIGwf8yrtMgqQlSncMfLk Eo5O0xosPCyZ/gcJWzQbU6I2ysVv97vbF4+SUEnuTKcQx9ivS9j26pQMCVwXb119U1MB GMIe/vdsL1NSqUvlOGGBk8/L/z6BySr8oqabY2yXIBWb6N4VPp81I7M8gpjk51k0e29M 2BEKUibiB6pKdm4ViXspwPv56Plp5iWabxYawFNILH3cXaMHGu0leuLPErM3i+OSxMsK UwAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rRAvRzhltoTzPQtf/yR8e3Dd74K9EO0zqzHJWWfU39k=; b=R7sUlp0WcJZdFFBxepyeKTtl/UnfRaafSETs4I0rI+J/V7ZqbwidmzrwoeuV9/G3Yf D9NlKRIgjoqJU23M+s6JmnP6uTC1TF/lI/ahqax3uz1EPOql4e+sHVwdbJsHHGvij2r2 iwnnjR6wHeuT87Zl1v9W9XaZXfqfNkbfloqRzvsiDZydIbO0YG/hRUz6He9LWxKhqlSA zb1P/qj1V0anC0h6sK14bZNaZLwUDKoSdmB4/I2gkyHeU34FlQqdy+MRuyFwtEY9LKVt N0Hj3Bng54NkAFK3caFW5Zbe1a9fYexeJZqO9WKc+riJz6eBiF4NhhyA1hNTX8FvH70m tuyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+6h/OY26M3P1Aa5EpuaCW7Tj6+ogpOTdqt1d6HFsfhGq5Qhjd 39SDkeM6yTcVhs6Q1zclyuKJcQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBDYT+a/TlslGBNP28WC6W30stDoCs/vWDziufpSQtKsns/uOp9AkNKNZWQxzXg7kaHuZg1g== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:96cc:0:b029:202:6873:8ab4 with SMTP id h12-20020aa796cc0000b029020268738ab4mr96915pfq.42.1616001859907; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:f:10:e113:95c2:2d1:e304]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q184sm19891630pfc.78.2021.03.17.10.24.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:24:13 -0700 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Graf , Yuan Yao Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nVMX: Handle dynamic MSR intercept toggling Message-ID: References: <20210316184436.2544875-1-seanjc@google.com> <20210316184436.2544875-3-seanjc@google.com> <66bc75f6-58c5-c67f-f268-220d371022a2@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 17/03/21 17:50, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Feel free to squash patch 3 in this one or reorder it before; it makes sense > > > to make them macros when you go from 4 to 6 functions. > > I put them in a separate patch so that backporting the fix for the older FS/GS > > nVMX bug was at least feasible. Not worth it? > > Going all the way back to 5.2 would almost certainly have other conflicts, > so probably not. I'll do a dry run before posting v2; if it's clean I'll leave things as is, if it's a mess I'll move the macro patch earlier. Thanks!