From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>
Cc: ardb@kernel.org, simo@redhat.com, rafael@kernel.org,
decui@microsoft.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] use crc32 instead of md5 for hibernation e820 integrity check
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:55:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YG+X8M6JfLY4cqmD@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f01021a0-2edd-da43-5f04-043b4f42be8b@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:53:59AM -0400, Chris von Recklinghausen wrote:
> On 4/8/21 11:30 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:15:06AM -0400, Chris von Recklinghausen wrote:
> > > Suspend fails on a system in fips mode because md5 is used for the e820
> > > integrity check and is not available. Use crc32 instead.
> > >
> > > This patch changes the integrity check algorithm from md5 to
> > > crc32. This integrity check is used only to verify accidental
> > > corruption of the hybernation data and is not intended as a
> > > cryptographic integrity check.
> > > Md5 is overkill in this case and also disabled in FIPS mode because it
> > > is known to be broken for cryptographic purposes.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 62a03defeabd ("PM / hibernate: Verify the consistent of e820 memory map
> > > by md5 digest")
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > v1 -> v2
> > > bump up RESTORE_MAGIC
> > > v2 -> v3
> > > move embelishment from cover letter to commit comments (no code change)
> > > v3 -> v4
> > > add note to comments that md5 isn't used for encryption here.
> > > v4 -> v5
> > > reword comment per Simo's suggestion
> > >
> > > arch/x86/power/hibernate.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/power/hibernate.c b/arch/x86/power/hibernate.c
> > > index cd3914fc9f3d..b56172553275 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/power/hibernate.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/power/hibernate.c
> > > @@ -55,31 +55,31 @@ int pfn_is_nosave(unsigned long pfn)
> > > }
> > > -#define MD5_DIGEST_SIZE 16
> > > +#define CRC32_DIGEST_SIZE 16
> > > struct restore_data_record {
> > > unsigned long jump_address;
> > > unsigned long jump_address_phys;
> > > unsigned long cr3;
> > > unsigned long magic;
> > > - u8 e820_digest[MD5_DIGEST_SIZE];
> > > + u8 e820_digest[CRC32_DIGEST_SIZE];
> > > };
> > > -#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5)
> > > +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32)
> > Should CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 be getting selected from somewhere?
>
>
> Yes, presumably from the same source that sets CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5. Also
> presumably there's value to not forcing the check if the config value is not
> set.
I wouldn't be so sure about that. It might just be a bug that CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5
wasn't being selected. Where is it documented that the user needed to set
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5=y if they wanted the hibernation image checksumming to work?
> >
> > If that is too hard because it would pull in too much of the crypto API, maybe
> > using the library interface to CRC-32 (lib/crc32.c) would be a better fit?
>
>
> Based on my statement above, the intent is to provide a simple drop in
> replacement for md5 so that users of FIPS mode can suspend/resume without
> any errors.
>
It's possible that most people have CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5 enabled for some unrelated
reason so the hibernation image checksumming works by chance.
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 is a different option so the same is not necessarily true.
However, note that CONFIG_HIBERNATION already selects CONFIG_CRC32 (the library
interface to CRC-32) but not CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32 (shash interface to CRC-32).
So, if this code just used the library interface crc32_le(), it will always be
available and the IS_BUILTIN() checks can be removed...
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 13:15 Chris von Recklinghausen
2021-04-08 13:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-04-08 13:42 ` Simo Sorce
2021-04-08 15:26 ` Eric Biggers
2021-04-08 15:52 ` Simo Sorce
2021-04-08 16:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-04-29 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2021-05-05 3:45 ` Eric Biggers
2021-04-08 15:30 ` Eric Biggers
2021-04-08 15:53 ` Chris von Recklinghausen
2021-04-08 23:55 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YG+X8M6JfLY4cqmD@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=crecklin@redhat.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=simo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®