From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, namhyung@kernel.org,
jolsa@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/25] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for hardware cache event
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:22:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YG8RqwmmE8YBe5uS@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617635467-181510-9-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 08:10:50AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index 0bd9554..d71ca69 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, struct perf_event *event)
> {
> struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
> unsigned int cache_type, cache_op, cache_result;
> + struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu = is_hybrid() ? hybrid_pmu(event->pmu) : NULL;
> u64 config, val;
>
> config = attr->config;
> @@ -375,7 +376,10 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, struct perf_event *event)
> return -EINVAL;
> cache_result = array_index_nospec(cache_result, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX);
>
> - val = hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> + if (pmu)
> + val = pmu->hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> + else
> + val = hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
>
> if (val == 0)
> return -ENOENT;
> @@ -384,7 +388,10 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, struct perf_event *event)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> hwc->config |= val;
> - attr->config1 = hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> + if (pmu)
> + attr->config1 = pmu->hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> + else
> + attr->config1 = hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
> return x86_pmu_extra_regs(val, event);
> }
So I'm still bugged by this, and you have the same pattern for
unconstrained, plus that other issue you couldn't use hybrid() for.
How's something like this on top?
---
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -356,7 +356,6 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
{
struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
unsigned int cache_type, cache_op, cache_result;
- struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu = is_hybrid() ? hybrid_pmu(event->pmu) : NULL;
u64 config, val;
config = attr->config;
@@ -376,11 +375,7 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
return -EINVAL;
cache_result = array_index_nospec(cache_result, PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX);
- if (pmu)
- val = pmu->hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
- else
- val = hw_cache_event_ids[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
-
+ val = hybrid_var(event->pmu, hw_cache_event_ids)[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
if (val == 0)
return -ENOENT;
@@ -388,10 +383,8 @@ set_ext_hw_attr(struct hw_perf_event *hw
return -EINVAL;
hwc->config |= val;
- if (pmu)
- attr->config1 = pmu->hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
- else
- attr->config1 = hw_cache_extra_regs[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
+ attr->config1 = hybrid_var(event->pmu, hw_cache_extra_regs)[cache_type][cache_op][cache_result];
+
return x86_pmu_extra_regs(val, event);
}
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -660,14 +660,24 @@ static __always_inline struct x86_hybrid
#define is_hybrid() (!!x86_pmu.num_hybrid_pmus)
#define hybrid(_pmu, _field) \
-({ \
- typeof(x86_pmu._field) __F = x86_pmu._field; \
+(*({ \
+ typeof(&x86_pmu._field) __Fp = &x86_pmu._field; \
\
if (is_hybrid() && (_pmu)) \
- __F = hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_field; \
+ __Fp = &hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_field; \
\
- __F; \
-})
+ __Fp; \
+}))
+
+#define hybrid_var(_pmu, _var) \
+(*({ \
+ typeof(&_var) __Fp = &_var; \
+ \
+ if (is_hybrid() && (_pmu)) \
+ __Fp = &hybrid_pmu(_pmu)->_var; \
+ \
+ __Fp; \
+}))
/*
* struct x86_pmu - generic x86 pmu
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3147,10 +3147,7 @@ x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_
}
}
- if (!is_hybrid() || !cpuc->pmu)
- return &unconstrained;
-
- return &hybrid_pmu(cpuc->pmu)->unconstrained;
+ return &hybrid_var(cpuc->pmu, unconstrained);
}
static struct event_constraint *
@@ -3656,10 +3653,7 @@ static inline bool is_mem_loads_aux_even
static inline bool intel_pmu_has_cap(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
{
- union perf_capabilities *intel_cap;
-
- intel_cap = is_hybrid() ? &hybrid_pmu(event->pmu)->intel_cap :
- &x86_pmu.intel_cap;
+ union perf_capabilities *intel_cap = &hybrid(event->pmu, intel_cap);
return test_bit(idx, (unsigned long *)&intel_cap->capabilities);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-05 15:10 [PATCH V5 00/25] Add Alder Lake support for perf (kernel) kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 01/25] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate Intel Hybrid Technology feature bit kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 02/25] x86/cpu: Add helper function to get the type of the current hybrid CPU kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 03/25] perf/x86: Track pmu in per-CPU cpu_hw_events kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 04/25] perf/x86/intel: Hybrid PMU support for perf capabilities kan.liang
2021-04-08 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-08 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-08 18:24 ` Liang, Kan
2021-04-08 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-08 17:40 ` Liang, Kan
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 05/25] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for intel_ctrl kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 06/25] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for counters kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 07/25] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for unconstrained kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 08/25] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for hardware cache event kan.liang
2021-04-08 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 09/25] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for event constraints kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 10/25] perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for extra_regs kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 11/25] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_num_counters kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 12/25] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_event_constraints kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 13/25] perf/x86/intel: Factor out intel_pmu_check_extra_regs kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 14/25] perf/x86: Remove temporary pmu assignment in event_init kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 15/25] perf/x86: Factor out x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 16/25] perf/x86: Register hybrid PMUs kan.liang
2021-04-09 6:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-09 13:50 ` Liang, Kan
2021-04-09 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-09 15:47 ` Liang, Kan
2021-04-05 15:10 ` [PATCH V5 17/25] perf/x86: Add structures for the attributes of Hybrid PMUs kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:11 ` [PATCH V5 18/25] perf/x86/intel: Add attr_update for " kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:11 ` [PATCH V5 19/25] perf/x86: Support filter_match callback kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:11 ` [PATCH V5 20/25] perf/x86/intel: Add Alder Lake Hybrid support kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:11 ` [PATCH V5 21/25] perf: Introduce PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE_PMU and PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE_PMU kan.liang
2021-04-09 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-09 15:24 ` Liang, Kan
2021-04-09 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-05 15:11 ` [PATCH V5 22/25] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Alder Lake support kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:11 ` [PATCH V5 23/25] perf/x86/msr: Add Alder Lake CPU support kan.liang
2021-04-09 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-09 14:35 ` Liang, Kan
2021-04-05 15:11 ` [PATCH V5 24/25] perf/x86/cstate: " kan.liang
2021-04-05 15:11 ` [PATCH V5 25/25] perf/x86/rapl: Add support for Intel Alder Lake kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YG8RqwmmE8YBe5uS@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome