From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992CEC43461 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AECE6128C for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240845AbhDLMLN (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:11:13 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:45292 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237718AbhDLMLM (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:11:12 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lVvOq-00GG9g-DR; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:10:40 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:10:40 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Dexuan Cui , "davem@davemloft.net" , "kuba@kernel.org" , KY Srinivasan , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "wei.liu@kernel.org" , Wei Liu , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at" , "rdunlap@infradead.org" , Shachar Raindel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] net: mana: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) Message-ID: References: <20210412023455.45594-1-decui@microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Currently the protocol versin is 0.1.1 You may ask why it's called > > "drv version" rather than "protocol version" -- it's because the PF driver > > calls it that way, so I think here the VF driver may as well use the same > > name. BTW, the "drv ver" info is passed to the PF driver in the below > > function: > > Ohh, yes, the "driver version" is not the ideal name for that. > > I already looked on it in previous patch, came to the conclusion about > the protocol and forgot :(. Which suggests it needs renaming. Andrew