mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	steve.capper@arm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:52:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHnAtePBSB8YBQNc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415172711.15480-1-alisaidi@amazon.com>



I've edited the thing to look like so. I'll go queue it for
locking/urgent.

---
Subject: locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath()
From: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:27:11 +0000

From: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>

While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can
acquire the lock without holding wait_lock.  The writer side loops
checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly
acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed
successfully which isn’t ordered. This exposes the window between the
acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads
following the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before
the write lock is truly acquired.

We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while
holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from
under it.

  Writer                                | Reader
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ep_scan_ready_list()                  |
  |- write_lock_irq()                   |
      |- queued_write_lock_slowpath()   |
	|- atomic_cond_read_acquire()   |
				        | read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
     --> (observes value before unlock) |  chain_epi_lockless()
     |                                  |    epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi);
     |                                  | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags);
     |                                  |
     |     atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed()     |
     |-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist);        |

A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the
atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire
semantics addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can
be switched to use relaxed semantics.

Fixes: b519b56e378ee ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock")
Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>
[peterz: use try_cmpxchg()]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
---
 kernel/locking/qrwlock.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_read_lock_slowpath)
  */
 void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
 {
+	int cnts;
+
 	/* Put the writer into the wait queue */
 	arch_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
 
@@ -73,9 +75,8 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct q
 
 	/* When no more readers or writers, set the locked flag */
 	do {
-		atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING);
-	} while (atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->cnts, _QW_WAITING,
-					_QW_LOCKED) != _QW_WAITING);
+		cnts = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING);
+	} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->cnts, &cnts, _QW_LOCKED));
 unlock:
 	arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 }

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15 17:27 Ali Saidi
2021-04-15 17:45 ` Waiman Long
2021-04-16 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YHnAtePBSB8YBQNc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®