From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3AFC433ED for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BE461409 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244982AbhDURt7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:49:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46038 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244996AbhDURtr (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:49:47 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 156A5C06174A for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lZGy2-0075m9-9w; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:48:50 +0000 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:48:50 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Kangjie Lu Cc: Guenter Roeck , Laurent Pinchart , Jiri Kosina , Greg Kroah-Hartman , open list , Linus Torvalds , Aditya Pakki , Qiushi Wu , x86@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Arnd Bergmann , David Airlie , Michael Turquette , Bjorn Andersson , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Daniel Vetter , Jean Delvare , Will Deacon , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , Johan Hovold , Jiri Slaby , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Johannes Berg , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/190] Revertion of all of the umn.edu commits Message-ID: References: <20210421130105.1226686-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> <4afeeb49-620d-5a9d-29fc-453f6118a944@roeck-us.net> <6406f3ad-141d-5533-c717-e11cea4e179e@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6406f3ad-141d-5533-c717-e11cea4e179e@roeck-us.net> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:59:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 4/21/21 8:21 AM, Kangjie Lu wrote: > > > All of the commits sent by my students are in good faith to fix some bugs. Just to make sure - does that statement cover the following commit? commit 0c85a7e87465f2d4cbc768e245f4f45b2f299b05 Author: Aditya Pakki Date: Tue Apr 6 19:09:12 2021 -0500 net/rds: Avoid potential use after free in rds_send_remove_from_sock And is "Ph.D. student in Computer Science" an accurate description of the gentleman in question? We all made utterly bonehead mistakes (if you want a fresh example of mine, take a look at 161aff1d93ab "LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT: fold path_mountpointat() into path_lookupat()"; see 035d80695fae for the merge of the fix and explanation of what was wrong in the original commit). However, there's a general expectation that once you become aware of dumb mistake in something you have published (and merge into mainline certainly qualifies as publication) you shall retract it as soon as possible. If a student is not aware of such expectation, their advisor really ought to inform them of it.