From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5864C433B4 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C14A6145D for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230093AbhD3PlC (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:41:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34930 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229532AbhD3Pk7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:40:59 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF774C06174A; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lcVFP-009dW5-SB; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:40:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:40:07 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Oliver Sang Cc: LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com Subject: Re: [iov_iter] 2418c34937: Initiating_system_reboot Message-ID: References: <20210428023747.GA13086@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <20210430155431.GB20100@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210430155431.GB20100@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:54:31PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > not sure if this soft_panic=1 test is still useful, but from test, it seems > not generate more useful information (attached one for example). > > and if you still want this test, could you help check our command line and > maybe supply further information how to enable it properly? Should be fixed in the current branch.