From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
luto@amacapital.net, eranian@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/2] perf/x86: Reset the dirty counter to prevent the leak for an RDPMC task
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 17:02:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJ0/bjek1ihh/2Ea@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1620915782-50154-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:02AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> + if (x86_pmu.sched_task && event->hw.target) {
> + atomic_inc(&event->pmu->sched_cb_usage);
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + x86_pmu_clear_dirty_counters();
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + }
So what happens if our mmap() happens after we've already created two
(or more) threads in the process, all of who already have a counter (or
more) on?
Shouldn't this be something like?
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2474,7 +2474,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_event_init(struct per
return err;
}
-static void x86_pmu_clear_dirty_counters(void)
+static void x86_pmu_clear_dirty_counters(void *unused)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
int i;
@@ -2512,9 +2512,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct
*/
if (x86_pmu.sched_task && event->hw.target) {
atomic_inc(&event->pmu->sched_cb_usage);
- local_irq_save(flags);
- x86_pmu_clear_dirty_counters();
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(mm),
+ x86_pmu_clear_dirty_counters,
+ NULL, true);
}
/*
@@ -2653,7 +2653,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_sched_task(struct pe
*/
if (sched_in && ctx && READ_ONCE(x86_pmu.attr_rdpmc) &&
current->mm && atomic_read(¤t->mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed))
- x86_pmu_clear_dirty_counters();
+ x86_pmu_clear_dirty_counters(NULL);
}
static void x86_pmu_swap_task_ctx(struct perf_event_context *prev,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-13 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-13 14:23 [PATCH V7 1/2] perf: Track per-PMU sched_task() callback users kan.liang
2021-05-13 14:23 ` [PATCH V7 2/2] perf/x86: Reset the dirty counter to prevent the leak for an RDPMC task kan.liang
2021-05-13 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-05-13 22:14 ` Liang, Kan
2021-05-14 3:50 ` Rob Herring
2021-05-14 13:48 ` Liang, Kan
2021-05-14 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-14 15:30 ` Liang, Kan
2021-05-13 14:42 ` [PATCH V7 1/2] perf: Track per-PMU sched_task() callback users Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJ0/bjek1ihh/2Ea@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®