From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: make device_set_deferred_probe_reason a no-op when !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 20:41:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJ1y8rJNUlwtrOoN@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210419104256.1709253-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:42:56PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> When debugfs is not enabled, the deferred_probe_reason string is never
> read. So there's no reason to spend time and memory on recording it.
>
> There's still a bunch of redundant kfree(NULL) calls and NULL
> assignments, but this gives most of the benefit (avoiding two
> vsnprintf() and a kmalloc()) for the minimal amount of ifdeffery.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> ---
> drivers/base/dd.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 37a5e5f8b221..6a197336c6a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -216,9 +216,13 @@ void device_unblock_probing(void)
> * device_set_deferred_probe_reason() - Set defer probe reason message for device
> * @dev: the pointer to the struct device
> * @vaf: the pointer to va_format structure with message
> + *
> + * The ->deferred_probe_reason string is only ever read when debugfs
> + * is enabled, so this is a no-op for !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
> */
> void device_set_deferred_probe_reason(const struct device *dev, struct va_format *vaf)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> const char *drv = dev_driver_string(dev);
>
> mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
> @@ -227,6 +231,7 @@ void device_set_deferred_probe_reason(const struct device *dev, struct va_format
> dev->p->deferred_probe_reason = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s: %pV", drv, vaf);
>
> mutex_unlock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
> +#endif
Can you move the #ifdef to a .h file and do this properly instead of
cutting up the function like this?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-13 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-19 10:42 Rasmus Villemoes
2021-04-19 11:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-13 18:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJ1y8rJNUlwtrOoN@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®