From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] tick/nohz: Remove superflous check for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:40:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJFAqnnWndcvHTvi@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210422120158.33629-4-frederic@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:01:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu() early check already makes what
> follows as dead code in the case of CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE.
> No need to keep the ifdeferry around.
Somewhat unrelated, but vtime_accounting_enabled_cpu() is missing a ' '...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-04 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 12:01 [PATCH 0/8] tick/nohz updates v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] tick/nohz: Evaluate the CPU expression after the static key Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-04 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] tick/nohz: Remove superflous check for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-04 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] tick/nohz: Update idle_exittime on actual idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] tick/nohz: Update nohz_full Kconfig help Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] tick/nohz: Only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-05 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-10 10:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-10 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-10 10:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 7/8] tick/nohz: Change signal tick dependency to wakeup CPUs of member tasks Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 8/8] tick/nohz: Kick only _queued_ task whose tick dependency is updated Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-05 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-10 10:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-05 13:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] tick/nohz updates v2 Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJFAqnnWndcvHTvi@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yeyunfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®