mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>,
	sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	john.ogness@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: stop spining waiter when console resume to flush prb
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 18:13:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJVnNQ7RGvx9JKxV@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YJP4F1UIt/eRZ96s@google.com>

On Thu 2021-05-06 23:07:19, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Thanks for Cc-ing Petr
> 
> On (21/05/06 15:39), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 
> > Many printk messages might get accumulated when consoles were suspended.
> > They are proceed when console_unlock() is called in resume_console().
> > 
> > The possibility to pass the console lock owner was added to reduce the risk
> > of softlockup when too many messages were handled in an atomic context.
> > 
> > Now, resume_console() is always in a preemptible context that is safe
> > to handle all accumulated messages. The possibility to pass the console
> > lock owner actually makes things worse. The new owner might be in an atomic
> > context and might cause softlockup when processing all messages accumulated
> > when the console was suspended.
> > 
> > Create new console_unlock_preemptible() that will not allow to pass
> > the console lock owner. As a result, all accumulated messages will
> > be proceed in the safe preemptible process.
> 
> If we have a lot of pending messages in the logbuf, then there is
> something chatty - some context (task, irq) or maybe several contexts.
> And those contexts can continue adding messages, while we print them
> _exclusively_ from preemptible context only. without ever throttling down
> printk() callers - something that console_owner spinning and handover
> does for us. And those printk() callers can even preempt
> console_unlock_preemptible() and cause delays and lost messages.

Luo, please, correct me if I am wrong.

This patch a about one well defined scenario. The messages are
accumulated between suspend_console() and resume_console().
It is "small" part of the system hibernation. And we need
to get them out now. There might be many if something special
was debugged.

I am pretty sure that Luo did not see any flood of messages:

   + Flood in more contexts would be balanced by switching
     the console_owner.

   + Flood in one context would be naturally throttled because
     this context will become the console_owner.

In each case, these messages would be generated after
console_resume(). Luo's original patch was explicitly talking
about messages accumulated during the suspend.

Luo, could you please provide some log showing the problem?

Best Regards,
Petr

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-07 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06  8:00 Luo Jiaxing
2021-05-06 13:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-07  8:35   ` luojiaxing
2021-05-06 13:39 ` Petr Mladek
2021-05-06 14:07   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-05-06 14:12     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-05-06 15:14       ` John Ogness
2021-05-07  7:58         ` luojiaxing
2021-05-07  7:33       ` luojiaxing
2021-05-07  7:49         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-05-07 16:36       ` Petr Mladek
2021-05-10  8:26         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-05-10 10:17           ` Petr Mladek
2021-05-10 10:32             ` John Ogness
2021-05-10 11:16               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-05-10 11:43             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-05-07 16:13     ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2021-05-10  8:29       ` luojiaxing
2021-05-10  9:50         ` Petr Mladek
2021-05-10 12:06           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-05-10  7:41   ` luojiaxing
2021-05-10  9:30     ` Petr Mladek
2021-05-11  7:32       ` luojiaxing
2021-05-11  9:08         ` Petr Mladek
2021-05-13  7:55           ` luojiaxing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YJVnNQ7RGvx9JKxV@alley \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=luojiaxing@huawei.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®