From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B7AC43461 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 09:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255556100C for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 09:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231370AbhETJLT (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 05:11:19 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:1951 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230458AbhETJLS (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 05:11:18 -0400 IronPort-SDR: oZwntUpz1n5qps2akWKAOO9Vo1+DjqgX9DmXBsInAovJcPkZBEJxNaNY1QG0tK6aOKleeOiWqf sgOPMvUSoAIQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9989"; a="188310055" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,313,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="188310055" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 May 2021 02:09:57 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 36flDbMelT1FAQcSXcjMe/L6FNkDnp1SQbWF/xEPMQ+eje3TPRz6dX5xf5XXYXfMpDYrKfls2Z oJQjwid8625A== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,313,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="412113558" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 May 2021 02:09:55 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1ljegi-00DRVG-Tc; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:09:52 +0300 Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:09:52 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Linus Walleij Cc: Maximilian Luz , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , linux-kernel , stable , Sachi King Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Add device HID for new AMD GPIO controller Message-ID: References: <20210512210316.1982416-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:50:50AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:03 PM Maximilian Luz wrote: > > > Add device HID AMDI0031 to the AMD GPIO controller driver match table. > > This controller can be found on Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 devices and > > seems similar enough that we can just copy the existing AMDI0030 entry. > > > > Cc: # 5.10+ > > Why? It's hardly a regression? IIRC the stable policy allows to backport new IDs. > > Tested-by: Sachi King > > Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz > > I've applied the patch for next without the stable tag for now. It can be pulled to stable afterwards anyway :-) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko