From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50379C47080 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF5D61132 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231810AbhEWOkS (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2021 10:40:18 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:53256 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231769AbhEWOkR (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2021 10:40:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=iGMgZiKnpMmGI8GF/PlcxqdvzTENt4I1mUB7ce0c6SE=; b=my0KWHvNDYWbMe9ZBBqgUBfBMI z/qQLm2HrkAQDWHBISqXry59OzTZY+ep23G+xPWtptLHaLOb0MzkEJeCb0Wbt40Ie9EdfstazUZDL a95oYr8FO9c4j7F5d8H0/y52LwA1N0p6OSEd8Jc9RGXbATJKDB0Imo8jWblXugAqQP4o=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkpFd-005n4o-PU; Sun, 23 May 2021 16:38:45 +0200 Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 16:38:45 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Joakim Zhang Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/2] net: fec: add ndo_select_queue to fix TX bandwidth fluctuations Message-ID: References: <20210523102019.29440-1-qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com> <20210523102019.29440-3-qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210523102019.29440-3-qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static void fec_enet_itr_coal_init(struct net_device *ndev); > > #define DRIVER_NAME "fec" > > +static const u16 fec_enet_vlan_pri_to_queue[8] = {1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2}; I wonder if priority 0 should be sent to queue 0? Andrew