From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58181C4320A
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:20:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3948660F52
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:20:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S233018AbhGZHkL (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:40:11 -0400
Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:49298 "EHLO
        smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S231778AbhGZHkI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:40:08 -0400
Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134])
        by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC70A21ED4;
        Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:20:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1;
        t=1627287635; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:
         mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
        bh=dqI+Ee5Giqt9QLyCDiFV9fDN7znSnNwARp3fuiYiLdc=;
        b=upGNLqFkSmmkH98NSEEE4bVXU8s7YEF69vWIoYCbwsCfkOJeThVu1P9KvzjIszLt4yOM67
        9gQr91/PzjGv/pKyAhnFGNknnsIYgyUNREsNn2fE2eRjknWQhYziaJMBBVchNQrYogaE0n
        IoVOunQuBNWXWdYqbNXTs2AzKVlwXKk=
Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.201.86])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7577DA3B8B;
        Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:20:35 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:20:35 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, jengelh@inai.de,
        Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: introduce process_mrelease system call
Message-ID: <YP5wUxx/TflLP6dq@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20210723011436.60960-1-surenb@google.com>
 <CALvZod7ehaHoWRD-Pzvet5c1LQ6DYDHjs=xbJWZYEdMsgTpRgA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALvZod7ehaHoWRD-Pzvet5c1LQ6DYDHjs=xbJWZYEdMsgTpRgA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu 22-07-21 19:03:56, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 6:14 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > +
> > +       mmap_read_lock(mm);
> 
> How about mmap_read_trylock(mm) and return -EAGAIN on failure?

Btw. wether there is a non-blocking variant or not we should use
killable waiting to make sure the task calling into this is killable
by userspace (e.g. to implement a timeout based approach).
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs