From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Cc: timur@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, alcooperx@gmail.com,
tklauser@distanz.ch, sean.wang@kernel.org,
srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, hui.liu@mediatek.com,
yuchen.huang@mediatek.com, huihui.wang@mediatek.com,
eddie.huang@mediatek.com, sean.wang@mediatek.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] Mediatek uart patch
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:03:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQJEzlb2NyxD1EpD@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729014817.11879-1-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:48:16AM +0800, Zhiyong Tao wrote:
> This series includes 1 patches:
> 1.fix uart corruption issue when rx power off
>
> when uart is used as a communication port with external device(GPS).
> when external device(GPS) power off, the power of rx pin is also from
> 1.8v to 0v. Even if there is not any data in rx. But uart rx pin can
> capture the data "0".
> If uart don't receive any data in specified cycle, uart will generates
> BI(Break interrupt) interrupt.
> If external device(GPS) power off, we found that BI interrupt appeared
> continuously and very frequently.
> When uart interrupt type is BI, uart IRQ handler(8250 framwork
> API:serial8250_handle_irq) will push data to tty buffer.
> The code path:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c#L1917
> mtk8250_dma_rx_complete is a task of mtk_uart_apdma_rx_handler.
> mtk8250_dma_rx_complete priority is lower than uart irq
> handler(serial8250_handle_irq).
> if we are in process of mtk8250_dma_rx_complete, uart appear BI
> interrupt:1)serial8250_handle_irq will priority execution.2)it may cause
> write tty buffer conflict in mtk8250_dma_rx_complete.
> So the spin lock protect the rx receive data process is not break.
All of this information should be in the changelog for the patch itself.
There is no need for a "cover letter" for a single patch like this.
Can you redo your 1/1 patch and add the above information to the
changelog text and resend it as a v2?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 1:48 Zhiyong Tao
2021-07-29 1:48 ` [PATCH v1] serial: 8250_mtk: fix uart corruption issue when rx power off Zhiyong Tao
2021-07-29 6:03 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQJEzlb2NyxD1EpD@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=alcooperx@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=hui.liu@mediatek.com \
--cc=huihui.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
--cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
--cc=yuchen.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®