mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
	Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: SVM: improve the code readability for ASID management
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:50:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQlz4YDu/W8+YsZl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802180903.159381-1-mizhang@google.com>

+Tom and Brijesh

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> KVM SEV code uses bitmaps to manage ASID states. ASID 0 was always skipped
> because it is never used by VM. Thus, in existing code, ASID value and its
> bitmap postion always has an 'offset-by-1' relationship.
> 
> Both SEV and SEV-ES shares the ASID space, thus KVM uses a dynamic range
> [min_asid, max_asid] to handle SEV and SEV-ES ASIDs separately.
> 
> Existing code mixes the usage of ASID value and its bitmap position by
> using the same variable called 'min_asid'.
> 
> Fix the min_asid usage: ensure that its usage is consistent with its name;
> allocate extra size for ASID 0 to ensure that each ASID has the same value
> with its bitmap position. Add comments on ASID bitmap allocation to clarify
> the size change.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>  - change ASID bitmap size to incorporate ASID 0 [sean]
>  - remove the 'fixes' line in commit message. [sean/joerg]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>
> Cc: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Cc: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
> Cc: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> ---

...

> @@ -156,11 +157,11 @@ static int sev_asid_new(struct kvm_sev_info *sev)
>  		goto e_uncharge;
>  	}
>  
> -	__set_bit(pos, sev_asid_bitmap);
> +	__set_bit(asid, sev_asid_bitmap);


This patch missed sev_asid_free(). 

And on a very related topic, I'm pretty sure the VMCB+ASID invalidation logic
indexes sev_vmcbs incorrectly.  pre_sev_run() indexes sev_vmcbs by the ASID,
whereas sev_asid_free() indexes by ASID-1, i.e. on free KVM nullifies the wrong
sev_vmcb entry.  sev_cpu_init() allocates for max_sev_asid+1, so indexing by
ASID appears to be the intended behavior.  That code is also a good candidate for
conversion to nr_asids in this patch.

For the sev_vmcbs bug:

From 78c334121adaa51a2a84942ec65dceefd3752590 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 09:27:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Fix off-by-one indexing when nullifying last used
 SEV VMCB

Use the raw ASID, not ASID-1, when nullifying the last used VMCB when
freeing an SEV ASID.  The consumer, pre_sev_run(), indexes the array by
the raw ASID, thus KVM could get a false negative when checking for a
different VMCB if KVM manages to reallocate the same ASID+VMCB combo for
a new VM.

Note, this cannot cause a functional issue _in the current code_, as
pre_sev_run() also checks which pCPU last did VMRUN for the vCPU, and
last_vmentry_cpu is initialized to -1 during vCPU creation, i.e. is
guaranteed to mismatch on the first VMRUN.  However, prior to commit
8a14fe4f0c54 ("kvm: x86: Move last_cpu into kvm_vcpu_arch as
last_vmentry_cpu"), SVM tracked pCPU on its own and zero-initialized the
last_cpu variable.  Thus it's theoretically possible that older versions
of KVM could miss a TLB flush if the first VMRUN is on pCPU0 and the ASID
and VMCB exactly match those of a prior VM.

Fixes: 70cd94e60c73 ("KVM: SVM: VMRUN should use associated ASID when SEV is enabled")
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 9f1585f40c85..f4f5d554eaaa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static void sev_asid_free(struct kvm_sev_info *sev)

 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		sd = per_cpu(svm_data, cpu);
-		sd->sev_vmcbs[pos] = NULL;
+		sd->sev_vmcbs[sev->asid] = NULL;
 	}

 	mutex_unlock(&sev_bitmap_lock);
--
2.32.0.554.ge1b32706d8-goog

And fixup for this patch:


diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index f3df1eba0c72..416ae0b687fc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -180,13 +180,12 @@ static int sev_get_asid(struct kvm *kvm)
 static void sev_asid_free(struct kvm_sev_info *sev)
 {
 	struct svm_cpu_data *sd;
-	int cpu, pos;
+	int cpu;
 	enum misc_res_type type;
 
 	mutex_lock(&sev_bitmap_lock);
 
-	pos = sev->asid - 1;
-	__set_bit(pos, sev_reclaim_asid_bitmap);
+	__set_bit(sev->asid, sev_reclaim_asid_bitmap);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		sd = per_cpu(svm_data, cpu);
@@ -1928,7 +1927,7 @@ int sev_cpu_init(struct svm_cpu_data *sd)
 	if (!sev_enabled)
 		return 0;
 
-	sd->sev_vmcbs = kcalloc(max_sev_asid + 1, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
+	sd->sev_vmcbs = kcalloc(nr_asids, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!sd->sev_vmcbs)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-03 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-02 18:09 Mingwei Zhang
2021-08-03  7:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-03 16:50 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-08-04 10:53   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YQlz4YDu/W8+YsZl@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dionnaglaze@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vipinsh@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®