From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43287C4338F
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE661008
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S230209AbhHKMnO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:43:14 -0400
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:55684 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S229483AbhHKMnM (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:43:12 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10072"; a="215140498"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,311,1620716400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="215140498"
Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58])
  by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Aug 2021 05:42:36 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,311,1620716400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="484877800"
Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40])
  by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Aug 2021 05:42:33 -0700
Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94.2)
        (envelope-from <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>)
        id 1mDnYx-007pAn-1L; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:42:27 +0300
Date:   Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:42:27 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Hoan Tran <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: dwapb: Unify ACPI enumeration checks in
 get_irq() and configure_irqs()
Message-ID: <YRPFs7qoACdN+bEw@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20210804160019.77105-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210804160019.77105-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:00:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Shared IRQ is only enabled for ACPI enumeration, there is no need
> to have a special flag for that, since we simple can test if device
> has been enumerated by ACPI. This unifies the checks in dwapb_get_irq()
> and dwapb_configure_irqs().

Bart, are you okay with the series? Can it be applied, please?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko