From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDEDC4320E for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045EB60EFF for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230304AbhH0Sy0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:54:26 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk ([142.44.231.140]:42332 "EHLO zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230005AbhH0SyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:54:19 -0400 Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mJgyi-00GZ6s-QW; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:53:24 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:53:24 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/19] iov_iter: Turn iov_iter_fault_in_readable into fault_in_iov_iter_readable Message-ID: References: <20210827164926.1726765-1-agruenba@redhat.com> <20210827164926.1726765-5-agruenba@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210827164926.1726765-5-agruenba@redhat.com> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 06:49:11PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Turn iov_iter_fault_in_readable into a function that returns the number > of bytes not faulted in (similar to copy_to_user) instead of returning a > non-zero value when any of the requested pages couldn't be faulted in. > This supports the existing users that require all pages to be faulted in > as well as new users that are happy if any pages can be faulted in at > all. > > Rename iov_iter_fault_in_readable to fault_in_iov_iter_readable to make > sure that this change doesn't silently break things. I really disagree with these calling conventions. "Number not faulted in" is bloody useless; make it "nothing could be faulted in"/"something had been faulted in" and it would make sense. Failure several pages into the area should not be treated as a hard error, for one thing, and ANY user of that thing will have to cope with short copies anyway, no matter how much you've managed to fault in.