From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234BEC433EF for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E6661381 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234108AbhJEKqY (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 06:46:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48376 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233077AbhJEKqU (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 06:46:20 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8323C06161C; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 03:44:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=cJD/+MY9O8PHjOJeBQShvY15RDowrj3eSl2/eSskHLA=; b=rT4wKb6l2b2KWtpvqqlmr7CJHE kLGA9UWh3rkdNMx3WCU5Lr8XcmcfZO41p+3Qqd1gDraI1mMY8dE6VgZnqF+4ep6IbegxcdZMM83QR E18KMtQA9l0o6LccN078woxgNDWtEDxTsCQCN0vjaN6ognriXh1nj7d6ptLL/maP9RVL0a0ta5SXI FUMvZx2J7rtU0zDuOW7z6eBW8v3BMf/sW5BFPH4nXfTM69r7HORC0jOncrJwo4O62iwbtsx3nMpgD EeX0ueiROd7+3o49zo2rR+by1nRZ1+qVxbfRowon/1ALXf26EC4ltPfTKek4Rc3jBIH1Iiad4ZTp3 7QgXfq9w==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mXhs8-000EnA-Jq; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 10:40:53 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEBA13002DE; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:40:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B864A203BF5E8; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:40:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:40:30 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Aubrey Li , Borislav Petkov , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Ben Segall , Catalin Marinas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Guodong Xu , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jonathan Cameron , Juri Lelli , "Cc: Len Brown" , ACPI Devel Maling List , LAK , Linuxarm , Mark Rutland , Mel Gorman , msys.mizuma@gmail.com, "Zengtao (B)" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Steven Rostedt , Barry Song , Sudeep Holla , Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tim Chen , Valentin Schneider , Will Deacon , x86 , yangyicong , Yicong Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/3] scheduler: Add cluster scheduler level in core and related Kconfig for ARM64 Message-ID: References: <20210924085104.44806-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> <20210924085104.44806-3-21cnbao@gmail.com> <20211005073544.GI4323@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 10:01:09PM +1300, Barry Song wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:35 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 08:51:03PM +1200, Barry Song wrote: > > > From: Barry Song > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang > > > Signed-off-by: Barry Song > > > > That is not a valid SoB pattern. The first SoB should be the author, the > > last SoB should be the one sending the patch, in this case both are > > Barry. What's Yicong's contribution in all this? > > Yicong made the benchmarks of SPECrate and collected the result data which > is in the commit log. I am not quite sure what is the best tag for > him. Is Tested-by > appropriate in this case? Yeah, that works for me, changed it.