From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Fix possible double-free in regcache_rbtree_exit()
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:40:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWR2+CAtFuGl4cSz@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211011135526.282115-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1470 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:55:26PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> In regcache_rbtree_insert_to_block(), when 'present' realloc failed,
> the 'blk' which is supposed to assign to 'rbnode->block' will be freed,
> so 'rbnode->block' points a freed memory, in the error handling path of
> regcache_rbtree_init(), 'rbnode->block' will be freed again in
> regcache_rbtree_exit(), KASAN will report double-free as follows:
>
> BUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in kfree+0xce/0x390
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack_lvl+0xe2/0x152
> print_address_description.constprop.7+0x21/0x150
> kasan_report_invalid_free+0x6f/0xa0
> __kasan_slab_free+0x125/0x140
Please think hard before including complete backtraces in upstream
reports, they are very large and contain almost no useful information
relative to their size so often obscure the relevant content in your
message. If part of the backtrace is usefully illustrative (it often is
for search engines if nothing else) then it's usually better to pull out
the relevant sections.
> Set rbnode->block to NULL when the 'present' realloc failed to fix this.
This is not a good fix, it will both leak block and corrupt the data
structure since now there's a NULL pointer where there should be a data
block. We should instead be moving the assignment of rbnode->block up
to immediately after the reallocation has succeeded so that the data
structure stays valid even if the second reallocation fails.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-11 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-11 13:55 Yang Yingliang
2021-10-11 17:40 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-10-12 1:18 ` Yang Yingliang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YWR2+CAtFuGl4cSz@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome