From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75B0C433EF for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8854660F4B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239029AbhJKPck (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:32:40 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53514 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239050AbhJKPcZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:32:25 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1207960FD7; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:30:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1633966222; bh=qNOuID3oGllggWVOJYDAs4WiOHb/u8THodubZUe5cNI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hczNldm4ilpy5d2rw7/HQI8YQAhwNVL4gxmrXW2HE94gT4bhv2wJer70mM10kRLUc TQyXBvbWz4CnRB4ZEFc8h5YTCBmI4AUc4vx2ZzsaCQyo/8SGlE9PRc65NZWVKZz5XQ h9E4qi8yxZR9a8cgnAmjvanRDtGgzCLKGG6XJHXo= Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:30:19 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Hunter, Adrian" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Bart Van Assche , "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 83/83] scsi: ufs: core: Fix task management completion Message-ID: References: <20211011134508.362906295@linuxfoundation.org> <20211011134511.235071707@linuxfoundation.org> <8dc0e077af3f4fd5a0887784f65bd722@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8dc0e077af3f4fd5a0887784f65bd722@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 03:03:59PM +0000, Hunter, Adrian wrote: > Hi > > This doesn't work. Please drop. Sorry, no idea why I sent it before testing. > > Specifically, in v5.10, ufshcd_tmc_handler() can be called under the same spinlock > it is using, which deadlocks. Ok, now dropped! thanks, greg k-h