mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kbuild mailing list" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Kühnel" <thomas.kuehnel@avm.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] initramfs: Check timestamp to prevent broken cpio archive
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:29:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWVHV8v3m+L+BH9s@fjasle.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASDu7RK0vLtx1991abx880DtQHK+U2FK3qKbH5Kcz3ipw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:02:33AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:02:33 +0900
> From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> To: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kbuild
>  mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Kühnel
>  <thomas.kuehnel@avm.de>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] initramfs: Check timestamp to prevent broken cpio
>  archive
> Message-ID: <CAK7LNASDu7RK0vLtx1991abx880DtQHK+U2FK3qKbH5Kcz3ipw@mail.gmail.com>
> 
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:59 AM Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Cpio format reserves 8 bytes for an ASCII representation of a time_t timestamp.
> > While 2106-02-07 06:28:15 (time_t = 0xffffffff) is still some years in the
> > future, a poorly chosen date string for KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP, converted into
> > seconds since the epoch, might lead to exceeded cpio timestamp limits that
> > results in a broken cpio archive.  Add timestamp checks to prevent overrun of
> > the 8-byte cpio header field.
> 
> Out of curiosity, how did you figure out
> "2106-02-07 06:28:15" was the overflow point?
> Is it affected by leap seconds?
> 
> 
> I got ffff816f
> 
> 
> $ printf "%x"  $(date -d'2106-02-07 06:28:15'  +%s)
> ffff816f

You have a local time zone offset of -9h?
I just did

$ TZ=UTC date -d@$((0xffffffff))
Sun Feb  7 06:28:15 UTC 2106

I should have mentioned the time zone info in the commit message.



> > My colleague Thomas Kühnel discovered the behaviour, when we accidentally fed
> > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP as is: some timestamps (e.g.
> > 1607420928 = 2021-12-08 10:48:48) will be interpreted by `date` as a valid date
> > specification of science fictional times (here: year 160742).  Even though this
> > is bad input for KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP, it should not break the initramfs
> > cpio format.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
> > Cc: Thomas Kühnel <thomas.kuehnel@avm.de>
> > ---
> >  usr/gen_init_cpio.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/usr/gen_init_cpio.c b/usr/gen_init_cpio.c
> > index 03b21189d58b..983dcdd35925 100644
> > --- a/usr/gen_init_cpio.c
> > +++ b/usr/gen_init_cpio.c
> > @@ -320,6 +320,12 @@ static int cpio_mkfile(const char *name, const char *location,
> >                 goto error;
> >         }
> >
> > +       if (buf.st_mtime > 0xffffffff) {
> > +               fprintf(stderr, "%s: Timestamp exceeds maximum cpio timestamp, clipping.\n",
> > +                       location);
> > +               buf.st_mtime = 0xffffffff;
> > +       }
> > +
> >         filebuf = malloc(buf.st_size);
> >         if (!filebuf) {
> >                 fprintf (stderr, "out of memory\n");
> > @@ -551,6 +557,17 @@ int main (int argc, char *argv[])
> >                 }
> >         }
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * Timestamps after 2106-02-07 06:28:15 have an ascii hex time_t
> > +        * representation that exceeds 8 chars and breaks the cpio header
> > +        * specification.
> > +        */
> > +       if (default_mtime > 0xffffffff) {
> > +               fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: Timestamp 0x%08x too large for cpio format\n",
> > +                       default_mtime);
> > +               exit(1);
> > +       }
> > +
> >         if (argc - optind != 1) {
> >                 usage(argv[0]);
> >                 exit(1);
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada

-- 
epost|xmpp: nicolas@fjasle.eu          irc://oftc.net/nsc
↳ gpg: 18ed 52db e34f 860e e9fb  c82b 7d97 0932 55a0 ce7f
     -- frykten for herren er opphav til kunnskap --

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-07 18:59 Nicolas Schier
2021-10-12  2:02 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-10-12  8:29   ` Nicolas Schier [this message]
2021-10-13  1:40     ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWVHV8v3m+L+BH9s@fjasle.eu \
    --to=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.kuehnel@avm.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®