mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: allow !GFP_KERNEL allocations for kvmalloc
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:23:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXfzRNIwE2q/hKgO@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <163524528594.8576.8070122002785265336@noble.neil.brown.name>

On Tue 26-10-21 21:48:05, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > GFP_NOWAIT is not a modifier.  It is a base value that can be modified.
> > > I think you mean that
> > >     __GFP_NORETRY is not supported and __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is required
> > 
> > I thought naming the higher level gfp mask would be more helpful here.
> > Most people do not tend to think in terms of __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but
> > rather GFP_NOWAIT or GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> Maybe it would.  But the text says "Reclaim modifiers" and then lists
> one modifier and one mask.  That is confusing.
> If you want to mention both, keep them separate.
> 
>   GFP_NOWAIT and GFP_ATOMIC are not supported, neither is the
>   __GFP_NORETRY modifier.
> 
> or something like that.

Fair enough. I went with this
commit fb93996c217cea864a3b3ffa8a8cd482bf0a1f62
Author: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 26 14:23:00 2021 +0200

    fold me "mm: allow !GFP_KERNEL allocations for kvmalloc"

diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index fdec6b4b1267..1fb6dd907bb0 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_mmap);
  * Uses kmalloc to get the memory but if the allocation fails then falls back
  * to the vmalloc allocator. Use kvfree for freeing the memory.
  *
- * Reclaim modifiers - __GFP_NORETRY and GFP_NOWAIT are not supported.
+ * GFP_NOWAIT and GFP_ATOMIC are not supported, neither is the __GFP_NORETRY modifier.
  * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL is supported, and it should be used only if kmalloc is
  * preferable to the vmalloc fallback, due to visible performance drawbacks.
  *
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-26 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-25 15:02 [PATCH 0/4] extend vmalloc support for constrained allocations Michal Hocko
2021-10-25 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmalloc: alloc GFP_NO{FS,IO} for vmalloc Michal Hocko
2021-10-25 15:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/vmalloc: add support for __GFP_NOFAIL Michal Hocko
2021-10-25 22:59   ` NeilBrown
2021-10-26  7:03     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-26 10:30       ` NeilBrown
2021-10-26 11:29         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-26 15:48   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-26 16:28     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-26 19:33       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-27  6:46         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-27 17:55         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-29  7:57           ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-29 14:05             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-29 14:45               ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-29 17:23                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-10-25 15:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/vmalloc: be more explicit about supported gfp flags Michal Hocko
2021-10-25 23:26   ` NeilBrown
2021-10-26  7:10     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-26 10:43       ` NeilBrown
2021-10-26 12:20         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-25 15:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: allow !GFP_KERNEL allocations for kvmalloc Michal Hocko
2021-10-25 23:34   ` NeilBrown
2021-10-26  7:15     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-26 10:48       ` NeilBrown
2021-10-26 12:23         ` Michal Hocko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YXfzRNIwE2q/hKgO@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®