From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: implement support for static call trampolines
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:23:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYj6ib6Mrp9rAjVJ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211105145917.2828911-3-ardb@kernel.org>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:59:17PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/static_call.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/static_call.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6ee918991510
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/static_call.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_STATIC_CALL_H
> +#define _ASM_STATIC_CALL_H
> +
> +/*
> + * The sequence below is laid out in a way that guarantees that the literal and
> + * the instruction are always covered by the same cacheline, and can be updated
> + * using a single store-pair instruction (provided that we rewrite the BTI C
> + * instruction as well). This means the literal and the instruction are always
> + * in sync when observed via the D-side.
> + *
> + * However, this does not guarantee that the I-side will catch up immediately
> + * as well: until the I-cache maintenance completes, CPUs may branch to the old
> + * target, or execute a stale NOP or RET. We deal with this by writing the
> + * literal unconditionally, even if it is 0x0 or the branch is in range. That
> + * way, a stale NOP will fall through and call the new target via an indirect
> + * call. Stale RETs or Bs will be taken as before, and branch to the old
> + * target.
> + */
Thanks for the comment!
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c
> index 771f543464e0..a265a87d4d9e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c
> +static void *strip_cfi_jt(void *addr)
> +{
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG)) {
> + void *p = addr;
> + u32 insn;
> +
> + /*
> + * Taking the address of a function produces the address of the
> + * jump table entry when Clang CFI is enabled. Such entries are
> + * ordinary jump instructions, preceded by a BTI C instruction
> + * if BTI is enabled for the kernel.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL))
> + p += 4;
Perhaps:
if (aarch64_insn_is_bti(le32_to_cpup(p)))
p += 4;
Perhapser still, add:
else
WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL));
> +
> + insn = le32_to_cpup(p);
> + if (aarch64_insn_is_b(insn))
> + return p + aarch64_get_branch_offset(insn);
> +
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + }
> + return addr;
> +}
Also, can this please have a comment decrying the lack of built-in for
this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-05 14:59 [PATCH v6 0/2] static call support for arm64 Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] static_call: use non-function types to refer to the trampolines Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-08 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 14:59 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: implement support for static call trampolines Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-08 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-11-08 11:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-08 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 17:55 ` Mark Rutland
2021-11-09 18:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:02 ` Quentin Perret
2021-11-10 11:09 ` Mark Rutland
2021-11-10 12:05 ` Quentin Perret
2026-03-12 18:02 ` Carlos Llamas
2026-03-12 18:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-03-12 22:10 ` Carlos Llamas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YYj6ib6Mrp9rAjVJ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome