From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Vincent Donnefort <Vincent.Donnefort@arm.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Valentin.Schneider@arm.com,
jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Mitigate race cpus_share_cache()/update_top_cache_domain()
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 12:19:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYkHu8kkp9q9/QPP@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtAQTCqhbaW90EiyerPM2x-==cX3Xodq+nAymVK_U=45vA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:08:33PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 18:52, Vincent Donnefort
> <vincent.donnefort@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Nothing protects the access to the per_cpu variable sd_llc_id. When testing
> > the same CPU (i.e. this_cpu == that_cpu), a race condition exists with
> > update_top_cache_domain(). One scenario being:
> >
> > CPU1 CPU2
> > ==================================================================
> >
> > per_cpu(sd_llc_id, CPUX) => 0
> > partition_sched_domains_locked()
> > detach_destroy_domains()
> > cpus_share_cache(CPUX, CPUX) update_top_cache_domain(CPUX)
> > per_cpu(sd_llc_id, CPUX) => 0
> > per_cpu(sd_llc_id, CPUX) = CPUX
> > per_cpu(sd_llc_id, CPUX) => CPUX
> > return false
> >
> > ttwu_queue_cond() wouldn't catch smp_processor_id() == cpu and the result
> > is a warning triggered from ttwu_queue_wakelist().
> >
> > Avoid a such race in cpus_share_cache() by always returning true when
> > this_cpu == that_cpu.
> >
> > Fixes: 518cd6234178 ("sched: Only queue remote wakeups when crossing cache boundaries")
> > Reported-by: Jing-Ting Wu <jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index f2611b9cf503..f5ca15cdcff4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -3726,6 +3726,9 @@ void wake_up_if_idle(int cpu)
> >
> > bool cpus_share_cache(int this_cpu, int that_cpu)
> > {
> > + if (this_cpu == that_cpu)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > return per_cpu(sd_llc_id, this_cpu) == per_cpu(sd_llc_id, that_cpu);
> > }
Blergh, that's annoying. Thanks guys, picked it up for /urgent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 17:51 Vincent Donnefort
2021-11-05 15:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-11-08 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-11-11 12:22 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Vincent Donnefort
2021-11-15 10:46 ` [PATCH] " Shinichiro Kawasaki
2021-11-15 18:33 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-11-16 8:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-11-16 8:45 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YYkHu8kkp9q9/QPP@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
--cc=Vincent.Donnefort@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®