From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD67AC433EF for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238681AbhKVPD6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:03:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53116 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233449AbhKVPD4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:03:56 -0500 Received: from mail-ua1-x92d.google.com (mail-ua1-x92d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B9CC061574 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:00:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ua1-x92d.google.com with SMTP id j14so27320075uan.10 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:00:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CmP2bXFruojw8kAtSj6UqlL7SjSwWnqcFws6u5CPCIc=; b=RV2PJLQSLxWJZ05lnNtM5IHsLgLmaoeBTTm6NuL2w3SH0Ok11sJvC5PDbs5wklpr3i uLtbywpCHvJHACFy/KiDjZwylIjxsrPQL4Coc6wynIX9+DDwvZlXS7C5BdGq5xTVCaMt /lhUWQUgk75mXD6JJBcE//LoxodQkrKHzDk6bgDZesP7l9MR/muMaIqS9blW/nR4xEfE yxME9JiDv8Z+FbgT9Galn0N77rBOFNfeiKuqH3E+89Ga+1HS62Bq+KU1dvblnM+1IHpb LoRC8fC3fzDsZaXguVfEhdfdhUv5tJ9ZGQyXjKtUqc2nizxTr96kIlDdqM2uUsofyCcg O8aQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CmP2bXFruojw8kAtSj6UqlL7SjSwWnqcFws6u5CPCIc=; b=xv6e+71HcHk08YRl/otlK2ISRfwKS5JNyTUF5dqnMWCY0ldxQ1/Vr/cADQzmQwAW/e oUWpHiLwamdkKjqIbxpIBxwOOJOQYUHnKeYW6fMJmvkfVEubqfQaYaxvKI9S0nU8UqDW gUw85rKBHmTHLDyNmzW+o+g6SW6GSYeu2Ujq8o2m6910CtL5ShDmxekjnhWfO48PzLuc x4NQJsUHQxTVxDcQojy+yWT0F53JuSelJxfZ0bZTOfXPwSM0mawXFI+ixs5WU1TqlOxU VmSMAOXXpaV1XZ/FXG6Hjjb0zMtCe4jQ1DauZfzwZbWdJft7zOWoOsWbjvqaKzKO8itU y2lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532yx6SnnZwcFgUz561QUSHZcWWvnyqhhuQLXCLrdlMcbErucGff 0tjQt2q7/F7allBqQoAI8sg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9tzowrWuZIQ3HOMTaJtFV2Ir4Q64/HuLIOszlDfJP6qTyEx83/hpiSV7n7aFklOsDmdramQ== X-Received: by 2002:a67:846:: with SMTP id 67mr53758720vsi.7.1637593249362; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:00:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([181.23.85.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o5sm476798vsa.4.2021.11.22.07.00.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:00:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 12:00:31 -0300 From: Gaston Gonzalez To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nsaenz@kernel.org, stefan.wahren@i2se.com, arnd@arndb.de, ojaswin98@gmail.com, amarjargal16@gmail.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] staging: vchiq_core: remove superfluous static_assert statement Message-ID: References: <20211122130926.342128-1-gascoar@gmail.com> <20211122135031.GB6514@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211122135031.GB6514@kadam> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 04:50:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:09:26AM -0300, Gaston Gonzalez wrote: > > After removing the BITSET_T typedef in commit d8a364820e01 ("staging: > > vchiq_core: get rid of typedef") the static_assert statement becomes superfluous > > as now we are checking if the size of the u32 type is 4 bytes. Hence, just > > remove the static_assert statement. > > > > Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter > > Signed-off-by: Gaston Gonzalez > > --- > > You sent the first version after the merge window had just started. > It's too early to be resending stuff. Leave it for two weeks after the > end of the merge window at least. > > regards, > dan carpenter > Ah, ok. I thought it was ok to resend after one week once the merge window was closed. Sorry for the noise. Gaston