From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Rei Yamamoto <yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irq: consider cpus on nodes are unbalanced
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 20:04:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ybx8zqja/UoCzVO3@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211217104407.2156-1-yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 07:44:07PM +0900, Rei Yamamoto wrote:
> If cpus on a node are offline at boot time, there are
> difference in the number of nodes between when building affinity
> masks for present cpus and when building affinity masks for possible
> cpus. This patch fixes a problem caused by the difference of the
> number of nodes:
>
> - The routine of "numvecs <= nodes" condition can overwrite bits of
> masks for present cpus in building masks for possible cpus. Fix this
> problem by making CPU bits, which is not target, not changing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rei Yamamoto <yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/affinity.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> index f7ff8919dc9b..d2d01565d2ec 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> @@ -269,8 +269,9 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
> */
> if (numvecs <= nodes) {
> for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
> + cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
> cpumask_or(&masks[curvec].mask, &masks[curvec].mask,
> - node_to_cpumask[n]);
> + nmsk);
> if (++curvec == last_affv)
> curvec = firstvec;
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-17 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 10:44 Rei Yamamoto
2021-12-17 12:04 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-01-14 1:58 ` Rei Yamamoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ybx8zqja/UoCzVO3@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®