From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] notifier: Return an error when a callback has already been registered
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:00:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YcTVb4thNW4RmEHn@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YcSWNdUBS8A2ZB3s@zn.tnic>
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 04:31:01PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
>
> Return -EEXIST when a notifier callback has already been registered on a
> notifier chain.
>
> This should avoid any homegrown registration tracking at the callsite
> like
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20210512013058.6827-1-mukul.joshi@amd.com
>
> for example.
>
> This version is an alternative of
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211108101157.15189-1-bp@alien8.de
>
> which needed to touch every caller not checking the registration
> routine's return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> ---
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> kernel/notifier.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/notifier.c b/kernel/notifier.c
> index b8251dc0bc0f..ba005ebf4730 100644
> --- a/kernel/notifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/notifier.c
> @@ -20,12 +20,13 @@ BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(reboot_notifier_list);
> */
>
> static int notifier_chain_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
> - struct notifier_block *n)
> + struct notifier_block *n)
> {
> while ((*nl) != NULL) {
> if (unlikely((*nl) == n)) {
> - WARN(1, "double register detected");
> - return 0;
> + WARN(1, "notifier callback %ps already registered",
> + n->notifier_call);
> + return -EEXIST;
> }
> if (n->priority > (*nl)->priority)
> break;
> @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ static int notifier_call_chain_robust(struct notifier_block **nl,
> *
> * Adds a notifier to an atomic notifier chain.
> *
> - * Currently always returns zero.
> + * Returns 0 on success, %-EEXIST on error.
> */
> int atomic_notifier_chain_register(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *n)
> @@ -216,7 +217,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(atomic_notifier_call_chain);
> * Adds a notifier to a blocking notifier chain.
> * Must be called in process context.
> *
> - * Currently always returns zero.
> + * Returns 0 on success, %-EEXIST on error.
> */
> int blocking_notifier_chain_register(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *n)
> @@ -335,7 +336,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blocking_notifier_call_chain);
> * Adds a notifier to a raw notifier chain.
> * All locking must be provided by the caller.
> *
> - * Currently always returns zero.
> + * Returns 0 on success, %-EEXIST on error.
> */
> int raw_notifier_chain_register(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *n)
> @@ -406,7 +407,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(raw_notifier_call_chain);
> * Adds a notifier to an SRCU notifier chain.
> * Must be called in process context.
> *
> - * Currently always returns zero.
> + * Returns 0 on success, %-EEXIST on error.
> */
> int srcu_notifier_chain_register(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
> struct notifier_block *n)
> --
> 2.29.2
>
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-23 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-02 13:36 [PATCH] " Borislav Petkov
2021-12-02 14:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-02 14:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-02 14:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-02 14:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-02 15:41 ` Alan Stern
2021-12-02 15:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-23 15:31 ` [PATCH -v2] " Borislav Petkov
2021-12-23 18:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-23 20:00 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2021-12-29 9:58 ` [tip: core/core] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YcTVb4thNW4RmEHn@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®