mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: menglong8.dong@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	dsahern@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	kuba@kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, edumazet@google.com,
	yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com,
	alobakin@pm.me, keescook@chromium.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	talalahmad@google.com, haokexin@gmail.com, imagedong@tencent.com,
	atenart@kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, weiwan@google.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, vvs@virtuozzo.com, cong.wang@bytedance.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	mengensun@tencent.com, mungerjiang@tencent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] net: skb: introduce kfree_skb_with_reason() and use it for tcp and udp
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 19:09:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdO6fL24CpHs6ByL@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <810dd93c-c6a2-6f8b-beb9-a2119c1876fb@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:01:30PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/3/22 6:47 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 05:32:37PM +0800, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
> >>
> >> In this series patch, the interface kfree_skb_with_reason() is
> >> introduced(), which is used to collect skb drop reason, and pass
> >> it to 'kfree_skb' tracepoint. Therefor, 'drop_monitor' or eBPF is
> >> able to monitor abnormal skb with detail reason.
> >>
> > 
> > We already something close, __dev_kfree_skb_any(). Can't we unify
> > all of these?
> 
> Specifically?
> 
> The 'reason' passed around by those is either SKB_REASON_CONSUMED or
> SKB_REASON_DROPPED and is used to call kfree_skb vs consume_skb. i.e.,
> this is unrelated to this patch set and goal.

What prevents you extending it?

> 
> > 
> > 
> >> In fact, this series patches are out of the intelligence of David
> >> and Steve, I'm just a truck man :/
> >>
> > 
> > I think there was another discussion before yours, which I got involved
> > as well.
> > 
> >> Previous discussion is here:
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211118105752.1d46e990@gandalf.local.home/
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67b36bd8-2477-88ac-83a0-35a1eeaf40c9@gmail.com/
> >>
> >> In the first patch, kfree_skb_with_reason() is introduced and
> >> the 'reason' field is added to 'kfree_skb' tracepoint. In the
> >> second patch, 'kfree_skb()' in replaced with 'kfree_skb_with_reason()'
> >> in tcp_v4_rcv(). In the third patch, 'kfree_skb_with_reason()' is
> >> used in __udp4_lib_rcv().
> >>
> > 
> > I don't follow all the discussions here, but IIRC it would be nice
> > if we can provide the SNMP stat code (for instance, TCP_MIB_CSUMERRORS) to
> > user-space, because those stats are already exposed to user-space, so
> > you don't have to invent new ones.
> 
> Those SNMP macros are not unique and can not be fed into a generic
> kfree_skb_reason function.

Sure, you also have the skb itself, particularly skb protocol, with
these combined, it should be unique.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-04  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-30  9:32 menglong8.dong
2021-12-30  9:32 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] net: skb: introduce kfree_skb_with_reason() menglong8.dong
2021-12-31  1:26   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-12-31  6:35     ` Menglong Dong
2022-01-01  2:22       ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-12-30  9:32 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] net: skb: use kfree_skb_with_reason() in tcp_v4_rcv() menglong8.dong
2021-12-30  9:32 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: skb: use kfree_skb_with_reason() in __udp4_lib_rcv() menglong8.dong
2022-01-04  1:47 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] net: skb: introduce kfree_skb_with_reason() and use it for tcp and udp Cong Wang
2022-01-04  2:01   ` David Ahern
2022-01-04  3:09     ` Cong Wang [this message]
2022-01-04  3:32       ` Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YdO6fL24CpHs6ByL@pop-os.localdomain \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=alobakin@pm.me \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
    --cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mengensun@tencent.com \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mungerjiang@tencent.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=talalahmad@google.com \
    --cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®