From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
To: Terry Bowman <Terry.Bowman@amd.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
<linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<wim@linux-watchdog.org>, <ssg.sos.patches@amd.com>,
<sudheesh.mavila@amd.com>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Add EFCH SMBus controller initialization using MMIO
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:05:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdgeU2p+i5hN1XCU@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9afabe55-6429-2284-cafd-d59ce481f067@amd.com>
On 06.01.22 13:07:11, Terry Bowman wrote:
> On 1/6/22 12:18 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 11:15:20AM -0500, Terry Bowman wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
> >> index 80ae42ae7aaa..4777e672a8ad 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
> >> @@ -48,12 +48,14 @@
> >> /* internal variables */
> >>
> >> enum tco_reg_layout {
> >> - sp5100, sb800, efch
> >> + sp5100, sb800, efch, efch_mmio
> >> };
> >>
> >> struct sp5100_tco {
> >> struct watchdog_device wdd;
> >> void __iomem *tcobase;
> >> + void __iomem *addr;
> >> + struct resource *res;
> >
> > I must admit that I really don't like this code. Both res and
> > addr are only used during initialization, yet their presence suggests
> > runtime usage. Any chance to reqork this to not require those variables ?
We did that in an earlier version, see struct efch_cfg of:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20210813213216.54780-1-Terry.Bowman@amd.com/
The motivation of it was the same as you suggested to only use it
during init.
Having it in struct sp5100_tco made things simpler esp. in the
definition of the function interfaces where those new members are
used.
If that init vars are no longer in struct sp5100_tco then callers of
efch_read_pm_reg8() and efch_update_pm_reg8() will need to carry a
pointer to them. To avoid this I see those options:
1) Implement them as global (or a single global struct) and possibly
protect it by a mutex. There is only a single device anyway and we
wouldn't need a protection.
2) Have an own mmio implementation of tco_timer_enable() and/or
sp5100_tco_timer_init().
> Yes, v3 will include refactoring to remove 'res' and 'addr'. I will also
> correct the trailing newline you mentioned in an earlier email.
>
> Regards,
> Terry
>
> >> enum tco_reg_layout tco_reg_layout;
While at it, tco_reg_layout is also only used during initialization
and can be moved there too. This would raise option 3:
3) Add a pointer of struct sp5100_tco to struct efch_cfg and use that
struct instead in init funtions only. But that causes the most rework
(which would be ok to me).
Going with 3) looks the cleanest way, I would try that. But all
options have its advantages.
-Robert
> >> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-07 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-03 16:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Replace watchdog cd6h/cd7h port I/O accesses with MMIO accesses Terry Bowman
2021-11-03 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Move timer initialization into function Terry Bowman
2021-11-03 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Refactor MMIO base address initialization Terry Bowman
2021-11-03 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Add EFCH SMBus controller initialization using MMIO Terry Bowman
2022-01-06 18:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-06 18:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-06 19:07 ` Terry Bowman
2022-01-07 11:05 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2022-01-07 17:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-01-10 9:22 ` Robert Richter
2021-11-03 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Enable Family 17h+ CPUs Terry Bowman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdgeU2p+i5hN1XCU@rric.localdomain \
--to=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=Terry.Bowman@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=ssg.sos.patches@amd.com \
--cc=sudheesh.mavila@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®