From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Robert O'Callahan <rocallahan@gmail.com>,
Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf: Default freeze_on_smi on for Comet Lake and later.
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:30:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ye7UDFAV5/OPaE5N@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c35dc76-c187-8d3f-7fc9-75de32e7cbf6@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:00:56AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 1/24/2022 7:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 11:26:44PM -0800, Kyle Huey wrote:
> > > Beginning in Comet Lake, Intel extended the concept of privilege rings to
> > > SMM.[0] A side effect of this is that events caused by execution of code
> > > in SMM are now visible to performance counters with IA32_PERFEVTSELx.USR
> > > set.
> > >
> > > rr[1] depends on exact counts of performance events for the user space
> > > tracee, so this change in behavior is fatal for us. It is, however, easily
> > > corrected by setting IA32_DEBUGCTL.FREEZE_WHILE_SMM to 1 (visible in sysfs
> > > as /sys/devices/cpu/freeze_on_smi). While we can and will tell our users to
> > > set freeze_on_smi manually when appropriate, because observing events in
> > > SMM is rarely useful to anyone, we propose to change the default value of
> > > this switch.
>
> + Andi
>
> From we heard many times from sophisticated customers, they really hate
> blind spots. They want to see everything. That's why we set freeze_on_smi to
> 0 as default. I think the patch breaks the principle.
Well, USR really, as in *REALLY* should not be counting SMM. That's just
plain broken.
There's maybe an argument to include it in OS, but USR is ring-3.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-24 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-22 7:26 Kyle Huey
2022-01-24 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-24 16:00 ` Liang, Kan
2022-01-24 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-01-24 17:03 ` Liang, Kan
2022-01-24 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-25 2:59 ` Kyle Huey
2022-01-25 13:57 ` Liang, Kan
2022-01-26 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-26 14:58 ` Liang, Kan
2022-01-27 2:22 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-01-27 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-27 11:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-02-03 14:33 ` [tip: perf/urgent] x86/perf: Default set FREEZE_ON_SMI for all tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ye7UDFAV5/OPaE5N@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=keno@juliacomputing.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=me@kylehuey.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=rocallahan@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome