From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Subject: Re: synchronize_rcu_expedited gets stuck in hotplug path
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:11:34 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yece9mH3nzwGxar6@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118200646.GJ947480@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:06:46PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Interesting. Adding Tejun and Lai on CC for their perspective.
>
> As you say, the incoming CPU invoked synchronize_rcu_expedited() which
> in turn invoked queue_work(). By default, workqueues will of course
> queue that work on the current CPU. But in this case, the CPU's bit
> is not yet set in the cpu_active_mask. Thus, a workqueue scheduled on
> the incoming CPU won't be invoked until CPUHP_AP_ACTIVE, which won't
> be reached until after the grace period ends, which cannot happen until
> the workqueue handler is invoked.
>
> I could imagine doing something as shown in the (untested) patch below,
> but first does this help?
>
> If it does help, would this sort of check be appropriate here or
> should it instead go into workqueues?
Maybe it can be solved by rearranging the hotplug sequence but it's fragile
to schedule per-cpu work items from hotplug paths. Maybe the whole issue can
be side-stepped by making synchronize_rcu_expedited() use unbound workqueue
instead? Does it require to be per-cpu?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-18 11:46 Mukesh Ojha
2022-01-18 20:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-18 20:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2022-01-18 21:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-24 14:02 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-01-24 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-24 16:58 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-01-25 20:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-26 7:32 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-01-26 7:33 ` Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yece9mH3nzwGxar6@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®