From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@google.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Christian Brauner" <christian@brauner.io>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
"Liam Mark" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
"Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>,
"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "Zefan Li" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Jason Ekstrand" <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Li Li" <dualli@google.com>, "Marco Ballesio" <balejs@google.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Hang Lu" <hangl@codeaurora.org>,
"Wedson Almeida Filho" <wedsonaf@google.com>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Chris Down" <chris@chrisdown.name>,
"Vipin Sharma" <vipinsh@google.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Kenny.Ho@amd.com, daniels@collabora.com, kaleshsingh@google.com,
tjmercier@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] dma-buf: Add DMA-BUF exporter op to charge a DMA-BUF to a cgroup.
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:54:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yeg0GGi0tdnnCLHg@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+wgaPMjCfjQS4LA8hmVwAaGfXZhoJvvTUnOGt3duOhFb3orTw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:54:16AM -0800, Hridya Valsaraju wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:46 PM Christian König
> <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > Am 15.01.22 um 02:06 schrieb Hridya Valsaraju:
> > > The optional exporter op provides a way for processes to transfer
> > > charge of a buffer to a different process. This is essential for the
> > > cases where a central allocator process does allocations for various
> > > subsystems, hands over the fd to the client who
> > > requested the memory and drops all references to the allocated memory.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/dma-buf.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > index 7ab50076e7a6..d5e52f81cc6f 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > > #ifndef __DMA_BUF_H__
> > > #define __DMA_BUF_H__
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/cgroup_gpu.h>
> > > #include <linux/dma-buf-map.h>
> > > #include <linux/file.h>
> > > #include <linux/err.h>
> > > @@ -285,6 +286,23 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> > >
> > > int (*vmap)(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_map *map);
> > > void (*vunmap)(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_map *map);
> > > +
> > > + /**
> > > + * @charge_to_cgroup:
> > > + *
> > > + * This is called by an exporter to charge a buffer to the specified
> > > + * cgroup.
> >
> > Well that sentence makes absolutely no sense at all.
> >
> > The dma_buf_ops are supposed to be called by the DMA-buf subsystem on
> > behalves of the importer and never by the exporter itself.
> >
> > I hope that this is just a documentation mixup.
>
> Thank you for taking a look Christian!
>
> Yes, that was poor wording, sorry about that. It should instead say
> that the op would be called by the process the buffer is currently
> charged to in order to transfer the buffer's charge to a different
> cgroup. This is helpful in the case where a process acts as an
> allocator for multiple client processes and we would like the
> allocated buffers to be charged to the clients who requested their
> allocation(instead of the allocating process as is the default
> behavior). In Android, the graphics allocator HAL process[1] does
> most of the graphics allocations on behalf of various clients. After
> allocation, the HAL process passes the fd to the client over binder
> IPC and the binder driver invokes the charge_to_cgroup() DMA-BUF op to
> uncharge the buffer from the HAL process and charge it to the client
> process instead.
>
> [1]: https://source.android.com/devices/graphics/arch-bq-gralloc
For that use-case, do we really need to have the vfunc abstraction and
force all exporters to do something reasonable with it?
I think just storing the cgrpus gpu memory bucket this is charged against
and doing this in a generic way would be a lot better.
That way we can also easily add other neat features in the future, like
e.g. ttm could take care of charge-assignement automatically maybe, or we
could print the current cgroups charge relationship in the sysfs info
file. Or anything else really.
I do feel that in general for gpu memory cgroups to be useful, we should
really have memory pools as a fairly strong concept. Otherwise every
driver/allocator/thing is going to come up with their own, and very likely
incompatible interpretation. And we end up with a supposed generic cgroups
interface which cannot actually be used in a driver/vendor agnostic way at
all.
-Daniel
>
> Regards,
> Hridya
>
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christian.
> >
> > > The caller must hold a reference to @gpucg obtained via
> > > + * gpucg_get(). The DMA-BUF will be uncharged from the cgroup it is
> > > + * currently charged to before being charged to @gpucg. The caller must
> > > + * belong to the cgroup the buffer is currently charged to.
> > > + *
> > > + * This callback is optional.
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns:
> > > + *
> > > + * 0 on success or negative error code on failure.
> > > + */
> > > + int (*charge_to_cgroup)(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct gpucg *gpucg);
> > > };
> > >
> > > /**
> >
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-19 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-15 1:05 [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-15 1:05 ` [RFC 1/6] gpu: rfc: " Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-15 1:06 ` [RFC 2/6] cgroup: gpu: Add a cgroup controller for allocator attribution of GPU memory Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-19 15:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-01-19 18:24 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-15 1:06 ` [RFC 3/6] dmabuf: heaps: Use the GPU cgroup charge/uncharge APIs Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-15 1:06 ` [RFC 4/6] dma-buf: Add DMA-BUF exporter op to charge a DMA-BUF to a cgroup Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-17 7:46 ` Christian König
2022-01-18 18:54 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-19 15:54 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2022-01-19 15:58 ` Christian König
2022-01-19 18:21 ` Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-15 1:06 ` [RFC 5/6] dmabuf: system_heap: implement dma-buf op for GPU cgroup charge transfer Hridya Valsaraju
2022-01-15 1:06 ` [RFC 6/6] android: binder: Add a buffer flag to relinquish ownership of fds Hridya Valsaraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yeg0GGi0tdnnCLHg@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=Kenny.Ho@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=balejs@google.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=daniels@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dualli@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hangl@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hridya@google.com \
--cc=jason@jlekstrand.net \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=lmark@codeaurora.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=wedsonaf@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®