From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Vipin Sharma" <vipinsh@google.com>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
seanjc@google.com, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
dmatlack@google.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: Move VM's worker kthreads back to the original cgroups before exiting.
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:30:43 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YehY0z2vHYVZk52J@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a0bc562-9f25-392d-5c05-9dbcd350d002@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 07:02:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 1/18/22 21:39, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > So, these are normally driven by the !populated events. That's how everyone
> > else is doing it. If you want to tie the kvm workers lifetimes to kvm
> > process, wouldn't it be cleaner to do so from kvm side? ie. let kvm process
> > exit wait for the workers to be cleaned up.
>
> It does. For example kvm_mmu_post_init_vm's call to
> kvm_vm_create_worker_thread is matched with the call to
> kthread_stop in kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm.
> According to Vpin, the problem is that there's a small amount of time
> between the return from kthread_stop and the point where the cgroup
> can be removed. My understanding of the race is the following:
Okay, this is because kthread_stop piggy backs on vfork_done to wait for the
task exit intead of the usual exit notification, so it only waits till
exit_mm(), which is uhh... weird. So, migrating is one option, I guess,
albeit a rather ugly one. It'd be nicer if we can make kthread_stop()
waiting more regular but I couldn't find a good existing place and routing
the usual parent signaling might be too complicated. Anyone has better
ideas?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-19 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-22 22:53 Vipin Sharma
2021-12-28 17:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-18 19:53 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-01-05 18:04 ` Michal Koutný
2022-01-18 20:25 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-01-18 20:39 ` Tejun Heo
2022-01-19 18:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-19 18:30 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2022-01-19 18:49 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-01-19 19:05 ` Tejun Heo
2022-01-20 15:05 ` Michal Koutný
2022-02-16 17:37 ` Vipin Sharma
2022-02-16 19:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-25 17:37 ` Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YehY0z2vHYVZk52J@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®