From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B2EC433F5 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 23:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377844AbiBDXEQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 18:04:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36188 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1377841AbiBDXEP (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 18:04:15 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-xc32.google.com (mail-oo1-xc32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c32]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C92FDF16703 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:04:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oo1-xc32.google.com with SMTP id i10-20020a4aab0a000000b002fccf890d5fso6337581oon.5 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 15:04:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxtx.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LLH8C4+l8RYV14uDg5g7U9UxpXvd6jKnz+PVszYki/Q=; b=HOTT/SkpvPtd0z+OcLUYk16o5WhQyx19AkvBGw3QmYtyeleGYLIdKvMSaHjTIi+jSo LjImssMA+BLEKCsg17CVih+75w4mMU/XmBY672S8L5uArytTeRh23pWqKasgB0ogWAGV dAuA4N0Cpn8cDE9Y0ZB95Z7G7vYa9j7od1w48= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LLH8C4+l8RYV14uDg5g7U9UxpXvd6jKnz+PVszYki/Q=; b=mmB8W4FngM6Ir6nojyy25FwxH4zJbRtnawYiQ7z2eHVU/mmAOo5lxeKWjVRjSJKqdI 3CQ8N8M8Z9YimD4KgEQjFQNelfxJIb7RZSbRg7oX9JnKCrULhZtWJ9Obbsj+qNikL7hP dil/hFX8YGpQ0Tn1D+4kSUYSFjjQBmzUeB3uI3l3VCL4jF6DXZ3SSCdgA7/0ELb7NNCh 6W85NrnDnRVd3H00wVLNzN7mb9MlXUv28rNfmWZnZQDFnQQUP1ZYR3I9/EUiGPu0mbby +tVp8pujWHXWIGkyFR3yNrFC6StLvb1mQ7ftMYq0OvQH38CgPbuHwnfyhpUQRnGd2NKL YdAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jpYEohHHSzdZH4Rw7ubbOUwTGuLW19tm2veq9LKqs7IEgdEx7 Aai1a36KWDEx0La6l3DRpyY7XbiySTBVo7fg X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwm7qPZitamobK6zNpLesurkbaT4f3OVe/zY5ltkiL2nHlgmilSGxOX9f++hrWoXbCWTPtDGg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:1083:: with SMTP id 3mr322467oaq.101.1644015853978; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 15:04:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora64.linuxtx.org (104-189-158-32.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net. [104.189.158.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cv13sm1060515oab.7.2022.02.04.15.04.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Feb 2022 15:04:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:04:11 -0600 From: Justin Forbes To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/32] 5.15.20-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220204091915.247906930@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220204091915.247906930@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:22:10AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.20-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted. Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes