From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9A7C433EF for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233968AbiBRLZP (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 06:25:15 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:32790 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231375AbiBRLZN (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 06:25:13 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A433136861 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 03:24:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012C4B825B2 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D99FC340E9; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:24:49 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: cgel.zte@gmail.com Cc: will@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, si.hao@zte.com.cn, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn, zealci@zte.com.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: kexec: Support the case of VA_BITS=39 in trans_pgd_idmap_page() Message-ID: References: <20220217083734.1903109-1-si.hao@zte.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220217083734.1903109-1-si.hao@zte.com.cn> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:37:34AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > From: sihao > > fsl64() may get different values due to different physical addresses. Is > it possible to confirm the value of max_msb with CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS? > > Reported-by: sihao > Signed-off-by: sihao > Reviewed-by: CatalinMarinas I have not reviewed this patch yet, so this line shouldn't be here. I'll have a look next week. Thanks. -- Catalin