From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] x86/cpu: Remove CONFIG_X86_SMAP and "nosmap"
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:53:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgOrT5emtH2damsR@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202202081854.90ABA52F@keescook>
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:56:40PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Cool; yeah, that's kind of what I was expecting. I have a knee-jerk "I
> don't want to touch this again later" reaction to seeing it always
> applied instead of gated by CONFIG_X86 or something, but then, I doubt
> that'll be hard to change when/if objtool becomes multi-architecture.
Yah, what I had doesn't build with 32-bit allnoconfig etc because of
CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=n or so. So I ended up doing, see end.
In this case, it gets set only when the earlier LTO_CLANG/STACK/VMLINUX
validation options are enabled.
We could do an is_enabled check around it but what would be the correct
criterium to enable uaccess validation?
> Consider the update as:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Thx.
---
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build
index a4b89b757287..404ea669ecca 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.build
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ objtool_args = \
$(if $(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER),, --no-fp) \
$(if $(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL)$(CONFIG_LTO_CLANG), --no-unreachable)\
$(if $(CONFIG_RETPOLINE), --retpoline) \
- $(if $(CONFIG_X86_SMAP), --uaccess) \
+ --uaccess \
$(if $(CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_OBJTOOL), --mcount) \
$(if $(CONFIG_SLS), --sls)
diff --git a/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh b/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh
index 666f7bbc13eb..fbdb531cca18 100755
--- a/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh
+++ b/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh
@@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ objtool_link()
if is_enabled CONFIG_RETPOLINE; then
objtoolopt="${objtoolopt} --retpoline"
fi
- if is_enabled CONFIG_X86_SMAP; then
- objtoolopt="${objtoolopt} --uaccess"
- fi
+
+ objtoolopt="${objtoolopt} --uaccess"
+
if is_enabled CONFIG_SLS; then
objtoolopt="${objtoolopt} --sls"
fi
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 11:56 [PATCH v2 0/6] x86/cpu: Do some janitorial work Borislav Petkov
2022-01-27 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/cpu: Allow feature bit names from /proc/cpuinfo in clearcpuid= Borislav Petkov
2022-02-07 22:04 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 11:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-04 18:22 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2022-01-27 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] x86/cpu: Remove "nosep" Borislav Petkov
2022-02-07 21:58 ` Kees Cook
2022-04-04 18:22 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2022-01-27 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] x86/cpu: Remove CONFIG_X86_SMAP and "nosmap" Borislav Petkov
2022-02-07 22:07 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-08 21:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-09 2:56 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-09 11:53 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2022-04-04 18:22 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2022-01-27 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] x86/cpu: Remove "nosmep" Borislav Petkov
2022-02-07 22:07 ` Kees Cook
2022-04-04 18:22 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2022-01-27 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] x86/cpu: Remove "noexec" Borislav Petkov
2022-02-07 22:25 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 17:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-08 19:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-04 18:22 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2022-01-27 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86/cpu: Remove "noclflush" Borislav Petkov
2022-02-07 22:08 ` Kees Cook
2022-04-04 18:22 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgOrT5emtH2damsR@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®