From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FC8C433EF for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243966AbiBJQCn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:02:43 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:58092 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232046AbiBJQCg (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:02:36 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71FAE5D; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:02:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id v12so10477670wrv.2; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:02:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7PANtWWD2Kt+GHWBLiAh9yfO08n/yT3I6/7j/Llw5GY=; b=Sgv0zC2zExaw9LYXehvrYYdC/OOpMR5IrFatO33Oasgf1h5l58VJ3uOMAJfOY1Nv5Q z+28+gAXeP/TlTW6jiepnXBJF5Cg4M35/34HKFymhthSXR2PLB7/BM6C95xpfVmEaJ4U KRz7+PDBxl8dDNl/qz3n7cg6TZ7qL0iAbbe7rJo1Vip7aLy9pQDFLxulaMRlwSXY15us 41yC6LBJlH26b+roAzbg4sw9eWhSCSJ64LqhoV402SWMJLokFrkvlhdwipcK4Ij945/H Nhq2RF1P4RumSGwnkAZ+5Xsq6FwSUga4fcqT9fNmatTIvW/U/sO5pM3Mj8Jh40vtRyO5 5rOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7PANtWWD2Kt+GHWBLiAh9yfO08n/yT3I6/7j/Llw5GY=; b=UYkp9nl9dQCpBVFfN4Ynhw3ckyhAgPrKkONsE3Wl2OBh3GTBCWlIjpvKED3qbyg9Yg qLmaMBkpP7dTz/MMlKk0/kAX5aJcPkmh/cbzE8Webb9+vLE8ApCJzzZS+ZPM2gwTJGWJ KhKCJY253RK+d9dKlneYLpJLMy5nxeqV2AVIGu7brO91WgNcF5p1rreTLYgROvPnKF0Q 1xMlBXCPYt0UDphQP+4ZtxWW7FcKY59EoN3EcXXTOtNUTET3eC6VqB07+PktBQLP6K9a NwmIWFasGX1UlBhfl27k/BknofI+YYdihgIrzOWh1gUd3Zzm8K+CMKJK2eZdiJRTcZuQ 3afQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tbIfjk+lrSzW8J+7O30zw8+pW49J3OwtOjQ4G0VL5mr7YKqJV MjAoeqHP+DGBEdWDjJUpIdw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwf67uwAasYWAYx5+iqoyLyRlZqlOiOqrCNtgT6F7SiBcNbSXGcixBRB5ZGLLerGBstYrsBOg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4448:: with SMTP id x8mr6850908wrr.529.1644508955188; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm7818807wrw.84.2022.02.10.08.02.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:02:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:02:32 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/3] 5.10.100-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220209191248.892853405@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220209191248.892853405@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release. > There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/734 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/738 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip