From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32726C433F5 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238184AbiBOPpm (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:45:42 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:60272 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234702AbiBOPp2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:45:28 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D93149BA8; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:40:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id q7so32690561wrc.13; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:40:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xRfR/3cl8ngHKj2jF/8jnAtft+nkVrmLjzr2g6FmtNs=; b=HlCeRB4UmweM9i3yvrc8utK/dbRmdx0h3G3wkWJWdGGtk3peH2YVMyIRdrp+xYxw52 Fhif/0VFBdswKLPW+17vXvbI/GnrROHAQbL7tQF4NT/CpA84OjUE/BCEF0FdW7jkxWDd Sz24Q9sM4WVUbwptdl1gM3kAOokwSRwax8xBrkw8JJ0u6SyOhyjrb6iMDJScIwtkpOF3 HSzXgYPCDM2jAmBKAkuTns1V4QUr7DdiYc0H/A2EI7JA/MTtY1JwjiKfUz9uMIf2Bl+s 43nb2cHiwwjOxrakxOu9G1NZrOoPCs3CKHh6TSm1IoqLTNLdYTImE7Yzc9FM8ByAgg1d +WCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xRfR/3cl8ngHKj2jF/8jnAtft+nkVrmLjzr2g6FmtNs=; b=mDfmyMGoI+eUzKh8PrpDYe9nuxgov2FVmcY9NwlIMa0VUC81kFXfqHLa22XprfwKAK CtzVCcmlJAucoI8HOjIglJt+roLpYcz6C2cC2zFhRIPYYi0Y6VT9HvPHNJbP3HkBdBdP WZwsvf0VTlvPn8rZhdHYQxTZoZX9IAJGVkw0ITTXjyd0vIIALX4iPhDNUObHfsNW5yV9 A4OM3SykWhdjoUEGFUCQ23qCC9OAuezKiIjeKFiXNjqECmvmoD7uhxD2ewESl76NdP68 /suXSCRw/Y2uzH/zf1EoOnuo+P5r7xO8FG44HPcBsBzkndP6SkXGwAo0RddkE+zI1qnk Vwqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BqwDTQddjvWIU0nbjK/ftI85Vo7/xgkP6L9gdpj6QZWzb8WLq bH4f/+1CAhA4FES+puXj8uc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJq7MB60D6D77HTVecIFAuon+J4kqwg747+Jptz0ejRLFXLZ54BqFzWgiuNPskPUtplqeEAA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f690:: with SMTP id v16mr3703067wrp.707.1644939605970; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:40:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ay38sm18225926wmb.3.2022.02.15.07.40.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:40:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:40:03 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/71] 5.4.180-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220214092452.020713240@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220214092452.020713240@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.180 release. > There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:24:36 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/760 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip