mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	aubrey.li@linux.intel.com, efault@gmx.de, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	mingo@kernel.org, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Remove redundant variable and fix incorrect type in build_sched_domains
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:49:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiIY48HK+DceO5gq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k0d9510z.mognet@arm.com>

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 12:56:44PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 18/02/22 21:57, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> > While investigating the sparse warning reported by the LKP bot [1],
> > observed that we have a redundant variable "top" in the function
> > build_sched_domains that was introduced in the recent commit
> > e496132ebedd ("sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when
> > SD_NUMA spans multiple LLCs")
> >
> > The existing variable "sd" suffices which allows us to remove the
> > redundant variable "top" while annotating the other variable "top_p"
> > with the "__rcu" annotation to silence the sparse warning.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202202170853.9vofgC3O-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > Fixes: e496132ebedd ("sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when SD_NUMA spans multiple LLCs")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/topology.c | 8 +++-----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > index e6cd55951304..4b757fb8f661 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> > @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
> >
> >                       if (!(sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES) && child &&
> >                           (child->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) {
> > -				struct sched_domain *top, *top_p;
> > +				struct sched_domain __rcu *top_p;
> >                               unsigned int nr_llcs;
> >
> >                               /*
> > @@ -2280,11 +2280,9 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
> >                               sd->imb_numa_nr = imb;
> >
> >                               /* Set span based on the first NUMA domain. */
> > -				top = sd;
> > -				top_p = top->parent;
> > +				top_p = sd->parent;
> >                               while (top_p && !(top_p->flags & SD_NUMA)) {
> > -					top = top->parent;
> > -					top_p = top->parent;
> > +					top_p = top_p->parent;
> >                               }
> >                               imb_span = top_p ? top_p->span_weight : sd->span_weight;
> 
> 
> So sd starts as the first domain without SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES (but its
> direct child has it), and the loop searches upward for a NUMA domain. This
> indeed shouldn't require two variables.
> 
> I was going to say that while you're at it, you could init top_p to sd
> rather than sd->parent in case someone runs a non-default
> sched_domain_topology[], but NODE should have neither
> SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES nor SD_NUMA, so that doesn't seem required.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>

Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-18 16:27 K Prateek Nayak
2022-03-04  3:48 ` K Prateek Nayak
2022-03-04 12:56 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-03-04 13:49   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-03-08 22:25 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YiIY48HK+DceO5gq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®