From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E78C433F5 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355094AbiCYMqr (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:46:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45922 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1354872AbiCYMqp (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:46:45 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF949AE49; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 05:45:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1648212311; x=1679748311; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wdZASh07jW2Uv04tJUTvIVlVtrgvV4l0iqkBPrtHDqo=; b=C8EAqH4uKmzXCc9SLoJJPZMV20ONab2h8vY8dFLDSSIvwrE0SxR8AfnX Yha34C4dp0IaDPf8glP6VsGUHAj95bkwjOO7vyfVlWjalIj2Z+7NrSILZ Od+eUvknkVaPtul46nuqotEEJlo08n1fzKy7gdCquRRmjKllzDkXAiikt /UbOCC55rf+lhiVz4cKUV0RBFE4WKw9bPJ9vhE8FVttRlLT8EO5cef7e4 jYIu6+TT/ipQIwP67yWgz5WRVEwRa38mhCivvFElitTjOhoGQ40IMoK7Z N7/gZGvR4t0jj8/y5y/xSuoYYol3Haum0A8XCKbloG+GWmmyrWviAmN9u Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10296"; a="321818956" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,209,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="321818956" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2022 05:45:11 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,209,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="584452838" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.59]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2022 05:45:10 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nXjIw-006Olr-TO; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:44:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:44:34 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] spidev: Do not use atomic bit operations when allocating minor Message-ID: References: <20220323140215.2568-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220323140215.2568-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 04:02:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There is no need to use atomic bit operations when allocating a minor > number since it's done under a mutex. Moreover, one of the operations > that is in use is non-atomic anyway. Shall I resend the series without this patch, or can you apply the rest if you have no comments / objections? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko