mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Matthias Welwarsky <matthias.welwarsky@sysgo.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86, possible bug in __memmove() alternatives patching
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 23:07:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yj49F1pnehy3ga5U@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3422754.iIbC2pHGDl@linux-3513>

+ dhansen for comment on...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 09:51:09AM +0100, Matthias Welwarsky wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> I've come across an odd behavior that I'm not sure whether it counts as a bug.
> I'm working on an x86 hypervisor at the moment and there was an odd problem 
> with a linux guest system dying during booting, but only on an intel NUC11 
> (i3-1115G4). It booted normally on any other system I tested on.
> 
> The guest was usin kernel version 5.10.89.
> 
> Now, the reason eventually turned out to be __memmove() getting broken when 
> applying the alternatives. The CPU on the NUC11 has the FSRM feature, which 
> enables a particular alternative in __memmove(). However, the code assumes 
> that the ERMS feature is always present with FSRM, otherwise the function gets 
> broken. Of course this is normally the case, a CPU without ERMS would never 
> advertise FSRM.
> 
> However: in the function early_intel_setup(), the ERMS feature might get 
> cleared depending on the IA32_MISC_ENABLE MSR: if fast string operations are 
> disabled through this MSR, X86_FEATURE_ERMS is removed from the available set, 
> but X86_FEATURE_FSRM is not removed.

... this thing, whether that's really the case on real hw.

Leaving in the rest for reference.

> Now, the hypervisor I'm working on emulates this MSR and in the particular 
> case, fast string ops were reported as disabled, leading to the above 
> mentioned inconsistency in __memmove().
> 
> The Intel SDM doesn't go into any details if disabling fast string ops through 
> IA32_MISC_ENABLE will also clear FSRM from cpuid leaf 7, but I think that's 
> not relevant for the linux kernel anyway because cpuid is parsed before MSRs 
> are evaluated.
> 
> I know it's is probably a very rare case and Intel recommends having fast 
> string ops enabled, hence the question: would this be considered a bug in the 
> kernel that should be fixed? A potential fix could be to clear FSRM together 
> with ERMS depending on IA32_MISC_ENABLE.
> 
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Best regards,
> 
> Matthias Welwarsky
> Project Engineer
> 
> SYSGO GmbH
> Office Mainz
> Am Pfaffenstein 8 / D-55270 Klein-Winternheim / Germany
> Phone: +49-6136-9948-0 / Fax: +49-6136-9948-10
> E-mail: matthias.welwarsky@sysgo.com
> _________________________________________________________________________________
> Web: https://www.sysgo.com
> Blog: https://www.sysgo.com/blog
> Events: https://www.sysgo.com/events
> Newsletter: https://www.sysgo.com/newsletter
> _________________________________________________________________________________
> Handelsregister/Commercial Registry: HRB Mainz 90 HRB 48884 
> Geschäftsführung/Managing Directors: Etienne Butery (CEO), Kai Sablotny (COO) 
> USt-Id-Nr./VAT-Id-No.: DE 149062328 
> 
> The protection of your personal data is important to us. Under the following 
> link 
> you can see the information in accordance with article 13 GDPR: 
> https://www.sysgo.com/privacy_policy
> 
> 

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-25 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-25  8:51 Matthias Welwarsky
2022-03-25 22:07 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2022-03-26  4:45   ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-26  8:27     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-29 22:34       ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-26 11:39     ` Matthias Welwarsky
2022-03-29 22:33       ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-30 13:56         ` Matthias Welwarsky
2022-03-30 14:44           ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-30 14:54           ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yj49F1pnehy3ga5U@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.welwarsky@sysgo.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®