From: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
"linux-staging@lists.linux.dev" <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: remove local BIT macro
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:34:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjhGnVL5mk4fbQVq@martin-debian-2.paytec.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac3343ea279b4d048d77b3cf2724bcbe@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Hi David,
thanks for digging into this mess.
Thus wrote David Laight (David.Laight@ACULAB.COM):
> From: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
> > Sent: 19 March 2022 18:04
> > The r8188eu driver defines a local BIT(x) macro. Remove this local macro
> > and use the one from include/linux/bits.h.
> > The global BIT macro returns an unsigned long value, the removed local
> > BIT macro used a signed int.
> > DYNAMIC_BB_DYNAMIC_TXPWR is defined as BIT(2), ~DYNAMIC_BB_DYNAMIC_TXPWR
> > is passed to Switch_DM_Func as a u32 parameter. We need a cast in this
> > case as ~DYNAMIC_BB_DYNAMIC_TXPWR is a 64-bit value on x86_64 systems.
> Hmmm....
> Why not fix the called function so that the caller doesn't
> need to do the invert.
When I look into this driver, it's challenging to fix one thing at a time
and not be caught up in all the other problems I discover along the way.
Would you be ok with removing the local BIT macro first?
It seems to me that this whole DYNAMIC_BB_DYNAMIC_TXPWR handling can go.
DYNAMIC_BB_DYNAMIC_TXPWR isn't checked anywhere. I'll submit this as a
separate patch.
With DYNAMIC_BB_DYNAMIC_TXPWR gone, ony three calls remain
16 6723 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c <<mlmeext_joinbss_event_callback>>
Switch_DM_Func(padapter, DYNAMIC_ALL_FUNC_ENABLE, true);
17 7124 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c <<createbss_hdl>>
Switch_DM_Func(padapter, DYNAMIC_FUNC_DISABLE, false);
18 7393 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c <<sitesurvey_cmd_hdl>>
Switch_DM_Func(padapter, DYNAMIC_FUNC_DISABLE, false);
DYNAMIC_FUNC_DISABLE is indeed 0 and sets podmpriv->SupportAbility = 0,
DYNAMIC_ALL_FUNC_ENABLE sets podmpriv->SupportAbility = pdmpriv->InitODMFlag.
We can do this without dubious casts and intermediate functions...
Best regards,
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-19 18:03 Martin Kaiser
2022-03-19 22:35 ` David Laight
2022-03-21 9:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-21 9:14 ` David Laight
2022-03-21 9:34 ` Martin Kaiser [this message]
2022-03-21 8:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-21 9:04 ` David Laight
2022-03-21 9:07 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjhGnVL5mk4fbQVq@martin-debian-2.paytec.ch \
--to=martin@kaiser.cx \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®